Skip to content
KitploitKITPLOIT
ToolsExploitsBlog
Log in
Submit
ToolsExploitsBlog
Submit

Hacking, PenTest, and Cybersecurity Tools for Your Security Arsenal!

Kitploit is a directory of hacking, cybersecurity, and pentesting tools. Discover the latest project updates to find vulnerabilities, analyze systems, automate testing, and strengthen your security.

FeedsContactPrivacyΒ© 2026 Kitploit

Tool Directory

Categories

View all categories
Loading categories
NexaCorp-DFIR-INC-2026-001 β€” DFIR investigation + 7 Suricata rules on a simulated NexaCorp intrusion (vsftpd 2.3.4 CVE-2011-2523 + MITRE Caldera C2). 4-day solo engagement (BeCode Brussels Mission 01). 54-page report, 10 findings, 7/7 rules validated by PCAP replay. | Kitploit
Tools/GitHubGitHub/jhatchi/nexacorp-dfir-inc-2026-001
Vulnerability AnalysisNetwork ForensicsDigital ForensicsPenetration TestingThreat IntelligenceIntrusion DetectionLearning & EducationIncident ResponseLabs & Practice
GitHubjhatchi/nexacorp-dfir-inc-2026-001

NexaCorp-DFIR-INC-2026-001

DFIR investigation + 7 Suricata rules on a simulated NexaCorp intrusion (vsftpd 2.3.4 CVE-2011-2523 + MITRE Caldera C2). 4-day solo engagement (BeCode Brussels Mission 01). 54-page report, 10 findings, 7/7 rules validated by PCAP replay.

View Repository
283 months agoNot yet reviewed

Most Popular

View all β†’

Discover the most used tools by our community.

Explore all tools

Browse our collection of tools

View all tools β†’
Share

NexaCorp DFIR: INC-2026-001 - Linux Infrastructure Compromise

DFIR investigation and detection engineering on a simulated intrusion against NexaCorp infrastructure. Conducted as a 4-day solo engagement (BeCode Brussels Blue & Red Team bootcamp, Mission 01). The deliverable is a 54-page findings report (PDF) plus 7 validated Suricata rules that catch the captured incident in PCAP replay.

ci Methodology Framework Detection CVE License LinkedIn

This repository documents a SOC analyst engagement carried out as part of the BeCode Cybersecurity Bootcamp (promotion 2025-2026). It reconstructs a full intrusion from network and log evidence, then delivers a validated set of Suricata detection rules. It is the first incident in the NexaCorp DFIR series.

Contents

  • Operational notice
  • At a glance
  • Engagement context
  • Executive summary
  • Kill chain summary
  • How to read this report
  • Methodology
  • Tools used
  • Findings summary
  • Detection engineering
  • Repository layout
  • Reproducibility
  • Known limits
  • NexaCorp DFIR series
  • Acknowledgments
  • About
  • License

Operational notice

This is a lab engagement against fictitious infrastructure. NexaCorp is a fictional client used as the scenario for BeCode Brussels Mission 01. The compromised host is a Metasploitable 2 VM intentionally vulnerable for security training, and the Caldera Sandcat implant is part of the lab teaching the analyst what a real intruder's beacon traffic looks like. No real organization, network, or human was attacked.

All IP addresses, hostnames, and indicators of compromise published in this report (172.16.50.10, 192.168.10.10, 10.40.0.200, blue11, mesdec, etc.) are lab-local artifacts, not real-world threat intelligence. Do not feed them to a SIEM as IOCs.

Publication authorized by BeCode lab coach (Thomas B.) on 2026-05-17. The full Confidentiality Statement appears in the findings report (section "Distribution and Classification").

At a glance

Engagement metadataValue
ReferenceBCC-2026 / INC-2026-001
Duration4 days (solo)
PhasesDFIR (forensic) + detection engineering
Delivered2026-05-15
StatusComplete (Phase 1 + Phase 2)
Investigation outputValue
Findings10 (3 CRITICAL, 3 HIGH, 2 MEDIUM, 2 LOW)
MITRE ATT&CK techniques mapped14
Network capture analyzed5,194 packets over 5h31m (943 KB PCAP)
Wazuh events correlated397 from agent 020
Suricata rules authored7 (SID 9000001-9000007)
Rules validated by PCAP replay7/7 (40 fast.log alerts, 314 eve.json records)

Engagement context

Scenario (fictional). NexaCorp, a mid-sized corporate client, contacted BeCode Corp's blue team after their internal monitoring flagged unexpected outbound traffic from one of their internal Linux servers. Their firewall logged the traffic but raised no actionable alert. The board needed a determination before deciding on disclosure and regulatory notification.

Mandate. Investigate the suspected incident window, characterize the attacker's path of entry and post-exploitation activity, assess what the existing detection stack caught (and missed), and deliver a prioritized remediation plan. A second phase added detection engineering: produce ready-to-deploy network IDS rules that would catch a recurrence in real time.

Evidence package received from the client.

ArtefactCoverageNote
Network capture (PCAP)2026-05-09 20:08 to 2026-05-10 01:39 UTC (5h31m, 5,194 packets)Starts mid-incident: implant already beaconing in frame 1
Host authentication log2026-05-10 06:47 UTC onwardPost-incident only (gap of ~5 hours after PCAP ends)
Host syslog2026-05-10 06:37 UTC onwardFirst entry is syslogd restart, suggests VM reboot
SIEM alerts export (Wazuh)n/aFile was an HTTP 404 response, not data. Recovered 397 events later via direct dashboard query

Educational context. This engagement was delivered during the BeCode Brussels Blue & Red Team bootcamp (November 2025 to September 2026) as Mission 01: a solo, time-boxed investigation simulating a real DFIR consulting engagement. The lab infrastructure, NexaCorp identity, and IOC values are deliberately fictional. The methodology, tools, and report format follow real-world standards (NIST SP 800-61r2, SANS PICERL, MITRE ATT&CK).

Executive summary

πŸ“„ The full 54-page findings report is the canonical deliverable. Download the PDF (215 KB) or browse the Markdown source for grep/citation.

On the evening of 2026-05-09 at 22:53 UTC, an external attacker (172.16.50.10) compromised a NexaCorp internal server (192.168.10.10) by exploiting CVE-2011-2523, the backdoor present in vsftpd 2.3.4 (a build that has been publicly documented as compromised since July 2011). A single FTP USER request ending with :) triggered an unauthenticated root bind shell on TCP/6200. The attacker ran 8 reconnaissance commands over a 20-second session (no persistence, no exfiltration, no lateral movement via this access vector) and disconnected.

Independently, the same host was found to be running a pre-existing MITRE Caldera "Sandcat" agent at /opt/caldera/sandcat (root, daemonized) beaconing every 40-50 seconds in cleartext HTTP to 10.40.0.200:8888 throughout the captured window. This is the "unusual outbound connection" originally flagged by the client and indicates a prior compromise not represented in the evidence package (the implant was already active in the first PCAP frame).

The existing Wazuh SIEM ingested 397 events from the target host but raised only 4 high-severity alerts (1.0% of total), all classified as generic brute-force (MITRE T1110). None identified the CVE-2011-2523 exploit payload, the bind shell on TCP/6200, or the Caldera C2 channel: the exploit byte (USER baduser:)) is never logged by vsftpd itself, and the SIEM had no network telemetry to see the rest. The 7 Suricata rules delivered in Phase 2 close all three gaps.

Headline IOCs (lab-bound, do not feed to a real SIEM):

TypeValueContext
Source IP (attacker)172.16.50.10vsftpd exploit, multi-protocol recon, SSH brute-force
Target IP192.168.10.10Compromised internal server (Metasploitable 2)
C2 IP10.40.0.200:8888Caldera Sandcat command-and-control
Backdoor port6200/tcpCVE-2011-2523 root bind shell
Exploit payloadFTP USER ending with :)Backdoor trigger pattern

Kill chain summary

Download Tool