Skip to content
KitploitKITPLOIT
工具博客
提交
工具博客
提交

黑客、渗透测试和网络安全工具,武装您的安全武器库!

Kitploit 是一个黑客、网络安全和渗透测试工具的目录。发现最新的项目更新,查找漏洞、分析系统、自动化测试并加强你的安全。

··订阅源·联系·隐私·© 2026 Kitploit

工具目录

分类

查看所有分类
Loading categories
工具/GitHubGitHub/xghst0/reconkg
Threat Feeds & AggregatorsVulnerability AnalysisNetwork SecurityPenetration TestingThreat Intelligence
GitHubxghst0/reconkg

reconkg

Vulnerability triage with provenance. Resolves CVEs from locally built corpora (NVD/KEV/EPSS, ExploitDB, nmap script.db) and emits verification commands classified by what running them does to the target.

查看仓库
3015天前尚未审核

最受欢迎

查看全部 →

发现我们社区最常用的工具。

探索所有工具

浏览我们的工具集合

查看所有工具 →
分享
内容在请求的语言中不可用。显示英文版本。

reconkg

A vulnerability triage tool. It takes what a scan already found, works out which CVEs plausibly apply, tells you how confident it is and why, and gives you the commands to check for yourself.

It does not scan anything, and it does not exploit anything.

Install on Kali

root@kitploit:~
git clone https://github.com/xGhst0/reconkg && cd reconkg && pip install -e . --break-system-packages && python -m reconkg.selfcheck

That last step reports what it can and cannot see: whether nmap's script.db was found, which corpora are configured, and how many realistic fingerprints actually produce a lead. Run it first. Out of the box the answer is "nine hand-written CVEs", and selfcheck says so rather than letting you assume otherwise.

Getting a real corpus

The nine built-in entries are a demonstration fixture. For anything real:

root@kitploit:~
export NVD_API_KEY=...          # free: https://nvd.nist.gov/developers/request-an-api-key
python -m reconkg.fetch  --dest ~/.reconkg/feeds --all
python -m reconkg.builddb --feeds ~/.reconkg/feeds --out ~/.reconkg/vuln.db

export RECONKG_VULN_DB=~/.reconkg/vuln.db
export RECONKG_EXPLOIT_DB=~/.reconkg/exploits.db
export RECONKG_SCRIPT_DB=/usr/share/nmap/scripts/script.db

Without the API key NVD throttles to 5 requests per 30 seconds and the full pull takes about four hours instead of twenty-five minutes. It checkpoints, so an interrupted pull resumes. --since pulls only what changed.

If a corpus variable is set and the file cannot be opened, reconkg refuses to start. Quietly serving nine entries when you asked for 300,000 would mean a scan that finds nothing and looks like it worked.

Use it

root@kitploit:~
python -m reconkg.app        # serves http://127.0.0.1:8765/ui
python -m reconkg.console    # REPL

app binds loopback only, with no flag to change it. This process holds your scan results and issues commands aimed at hosts you are testing; an SSH tunnel is a small price next to having that reachable from the rest of the network. --port moves it, RECONKG_PORT sets a default.

Authentication. Every route needs Authorization: Bearer <token>, from RECONKG_TOKENS in the form name:role:token (roles: viewer, scanner, operator, admin; tokens at least 16 characters). If it is unset, app mints one for that process only and prints it at startup — not written to disk, different every restart.

A browser cannot attach a header to a plain navigation, so opening /ui directly will 401. Use a header-injecting extension, or drive the API:

root@kitploit:~
export RECONKG_TOKENS="me:admin:$(openssl rand -hex 16)"
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer ${RECONKG_TOKENS##*:}" \
     http://127.0.0.1:8765/api/corpus

The UI shows the knowledge graph with provenance on click, so you can see why a CVE was attached to a host rather than trusting a score, and a ledger ordered by triage priority with KEV and EPSS weighed in.

What it will and will not hand you

Every suggested command carries an NSE category describing what running it does to the target. That vocabulary is nmap's, not invented here.

The last row is the boundary. If a working exploit exists for a lead, reconkg tells you the module or template and where to find it. It does not assemble that into an invocation with your target already in it. Metasploit suggestions stop at show options — the step where you read RHOSTS back and confirm it is the host you are authorised against.

That is one keystroke of difference on a box you own, and a much larger difference in what the tool is.

Safety is classified per check, never per tool. That is not fussiness: current nuclei CVE templates achieve detection by exploiting — one posts a subprocess.run('cat /etc/passwd') payload through a Langflow RCE and matches on root:.*:0:0:. Anything that assumes "nuclei detects, Metasploit exploits" is wrong at the first template it meets, so nuclei is treated as unclassified and sits behind the opt-in.

Honest limits

  • Version inference is blind to backporting. RHEL and Debian patch in place without changing the version string, so a version match is not a patch-level match. Leads say so.
  • Most boxes do not fall to a version→CVE path. Web logic flaws, credential reuse, SUID/sudo misconfiguration and AD abuse have no CVE to match, and no corpus size changes that. selfcheck prints the real hit rate rather than a flattering one.
  • A stale corpus under-reports silently. Every CVE published since the last build is simply absent, reported with the same confidence as a true negative. describe() marks a corpus stale past 30 days and names which feed is old.

Development

root@kitploit:~
pip install -r requirements-dev.txt
python -m pytest tests/ -q          # 1219 tests
python -m audit.mutation            # mutation testing, 12 targets at 100%
python -m audit.scale_bench         # corpus scale benchmark

docs/ carries the design notes and the reasoning behind the decisions above. audit/AUDIT.md is the finding record: 47 findings across ten adversarial rounds, including an analysis of the one bug shape that accounts for 13 of them and an honest assessment of what has and has not prevented it.

Licence

MIT — see LICENSE.

reconkg ships no vulnerability data. The corpora are built on your machine from feeds you fetch yourself, which keeps their licences yours to honour; ExploitDB's index in particular is GPL-2.0-or-later and is deliberately never redistributed here.

Use it on things you are allowed to touch

Everything reconkg emits is a suggestion for a human to run. Running intrusive or vuln checks against a system you do not own or have written authorisation to test is illegal in most jurisdictions.

下载工具
CategoryWhat reconkg does
safe, discovery, versioncomposed, shown by default
intrusive, vuln, unclassifiedcomposed, shown when you tick the box, with the authorisation warning
exploit, dos, fuzzer, brutenamed, never composed