Skip to content
KitploitKITPLOIT
工具漏洞利用博客
提交
工具漏洞利用博客
提交

黑客、渗透测试和网络安全工具,武装您的安全武器库!

Kitploit 是一个黑客、网络安全和渗透测试工具的目录。发现最新的项目更新,查找漏洞、分析系统、自动化测试并加强你的安全。

··订阅源·联系·隐私·© 2026 Kitploit

工具目录

分类

查看所有分类
Loading categories
工具/GitHubGitHub/4n4s4zi/tfo-connect-bypass
ExploitationIDS/IPS EvasionWeb Application ExploitationPost-ExploitationNetwork SecurityRed Teaming
GitHub4n4s4zi/tfo-connect-bypass

tfo-connect-bypass

Using TCP Fast Open to bypass syscall-based networking rules (CVE-2026-63828/CVE-2026-72243 PoC)

查看仓库
1416天前尚未审核

最受欢迎

查看全部 →

发现我们社区最常用的工具。

探索所有工具

浏览我们的工具集合

查看所有工具 →
分享
内容在请求的语言中不可用。显示英文版本。

Using TCP Fast Open to Bypass Syscall-based Networking Rules (CVE-2026-63828/CVE-2026-72243 PoC)

TCP Fast Open (TFO) is a method of initializing and using a TCP connection where the client can send data in the initial SYN packet sent to the server. This extension to the TCP protocol was implemented for speed benefits because the back and forth of the initial TCP handshake can be skipped for repeated connections. There's more to the implementation details if you care about using it in a production-level setting, but it's useful for evading some syscall-based rule engines because it's one way of opening TCP connections without using the connect syscall explicitly.

From a syscall perspective, a basic TCP connection generally looks like:

root@kitploit:~
socket() -> connect() -> write()/read()

A TFO connection, however, is initialized using a sendto syscall with the MSG_FASTOPEN flag:

root@kitploit:~
socket() -> sendto(...,MSG_FASTOPEN,...) -> write()/read()

I kind of explored this as a side quest for something else I was working on but in doing more research on TFO, CVE-2026-63828/CVE-2026-72243 came up as a (recent) known bypass specific to networking-confined processes in AppArmor/SELinux. It applies to more than just AppArmor and SELinux though (many eBPF-based montoring engines also specifically hook connect syscalls for detection rules) so I thought I'd post a basic poc here.

Say you wanted to query a Kubernetes API server from inside a container as part of post-ex recon but there are eBPF-, AppArmor-, SELinux-, or some other syscall-based monitoring/blocking rules in place. If you don't want to use a more heavy networking implementation/library in userland and other syscall evasion primitives like io_uring aren't available, TFO might be useful. Again, this is just a simple PoC and not a robust TFO stack.

Portable build:

root@kitploit:~
CGO_ENABLED=0 GOOS=linux GOARCH=amd64 go build test.go

References:

  • https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-72243
  • https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/cve-2026-63828
  • https://www.sentinelone.com/vulnerability-database/cve-2026-63828
下载工具