Skip to content
KitploitKITPLOIT
도구익스플로잇블로그
Log in
제출
도구익스플로잇블로그
제출

해킹, 침투 테스트 및 사이버 보안 도구를 당신의 보안 무기고에!

Kitploit은 해킹, 사이버 보안 및 침투 테스트 도구 디렉토리입니다. 최신 프로젝트 업데이트를 발견하여 취약점을 찾고, 시스템을 분석하고, 테스트를 자동화하고, 보안을 강화하세요.

··피드·문의·개인정보·© 2026 Kitploit

도구 디렉토리

카테고리

모든 카테고리 보기
Loading categories
Office-Malware-Forensics-Lab-REMnux-Static-Analysis — Static analysis of 2 malicious Office documents on REMnux using oletools; identified CVE-2017-11882 and obfuscated macros. | Kitploit
도구/GitHubGitHub/mo200909/office-malware-forensics-lab-remnux-static-analysis
Static AnalysisVulnerability AnalysisCode AnalysisExploitationForensicsMalware AnalysisDigital ForensicsLearning & EducationLabs & Practice

인기

모두 보기 →

커뮤니티에서 가장 많이 사용되는 도구를 찾아보세요.

모든 도구 탐색

도구 컬렉션을 둘러보세요

모든 도구 보기 →
GitHubmo200909/office-malware-forensics-lab-remnux-static-analysis

Office-Malware-Forensics-Lab-REMnux-Static-Analysis

Static analysis of 2 malicious Office documents on REMnux using oletools; identified CVE-2017-11882 and obfuscated macros.

저장소 보기
2115일 전아직 검토되지 않음
공유
요청한 언어로 콘텐츠를 사용할 수 없습니다. 영어 버전을 표시합니다.

Office Malware Forensics Lab — REMnux Static Analysis

Static analysis of two malicious Office files, done entirely inside an isolated REMnux VM. Nothing was ever executed — just inspected.

Setup

  • REMnux VM, no shared folders with the host
  • Tools: sha256sum, file, unzip, and the oletools suite (oleid, olevba, oledump, mraptor)
  • Both samples pulled from MalwareBazaar (abuse.ch)

Sample 1: Malicious Word doc (.docx)

SHA-256: 68e82279bff55cf3b9f1f22ec4a165b1b1245a359f7e8d86664b2541d8f8d3fe

What I found:

  • A file inside the docx (nste.xml) was actually Rich Text Format data pretending to be XML — a mismatch that's a red flag on its own
  • One embedded object was a 196 KB VBS executable (419876.vbs)
  • Another embedded object matched CVE-2017-11882 — a known Equation Editor exploit that runs just from opening the file, no macros needed

Verdict: Malicious. This is a real weaponized document using a known RCE to drop an executable.

Sample 2: Malicious Excel file (.xlsx)

SHA-256: dc65419ba5d83b980d7018198a14209fa2f5ebf6f99d47bfe9f586852087befe

What I found:

  • The file was encrypted (password-protected), which normally hides macro content from AV scanners
  • It had 4 VBA modules, but all 4 came back empty — mraptor returned "Macro OK" with no AutoExec/Write/Execute flags
  • One worksheet was hidden
  • There were hex-encoded strings sitting in an old-style XLM macro stream, separate from the VBA layer
  • Decoding those strings didn't turn up shellcode or a download URL — just some type-library identifiers

Verdict: Suspicious, but inconclusive. The encryption, hidden sheet, and obfuscated strings all look like evasion tactics, but I couldn't confirm an actual live payload in the VBA layer. The real payload may live in the legacy XLM macro layer (which I didn't fully reverse), or this could be an incomplete/staging sample.

Steps I followed

  1. Hash each file (SHA-256) for chain of custody
  2. Check the real file type with file, compare to the extension
  3. Run oleid for a quick read on encryption/macros/external links
  4. Run oledump to list every embedded object
  5. Run olevba to pull and decode any VBA source
  6. Run mraptor to check for auto-running macro behavior

What this shows

  • How to spot a file type mismatch used to dodge detection
  • How CVE-2017-11882 works without needing macros at all
  • How to actually verify macro behavior instead of assuming it from surface-level indicators
  • Why encryption + hidden sheets + obfuscated strings don't automatically mean "confirmed malicious" — sometimes the evidence is inconclusive, and that's worth saying plainly

Sources

  • CVE-2017-11882: Microsoft Equation Editor RCE
  • oletools: https://github.com/decalage2/oletools
  • MalwareBazaar: https://bazaar.abuse.ch
  • REMnux docs: https://docs.remnux.org

Author

Mofolorunsho Adeleke GitHub: https://github.com/Mo200909

도구 다운로드