clawk

A coding agent is only useful when you let it actually do things: install packages, run the code it writes, start servers, use the network. On your own machine that leaves two bad options. You approve every command (and babysit a prompt every few seconds), or you run --dangerously-skip-permissions and hope nothing important is one rm -rf or one leaked token away.

clawk is a third option. cd into a repo, type clawk, and Claude Code (or Codex, or pi, or a shell) is working inside a disposable Linux VM (your code mounted in, root in the guest, no permission prompts) while your files, your keychain, and the rest of your machine stay out of reach. The agent gets its own machine instead of yours.

_{One command to a working agent; an attempt to send data to an unknown server, blocked by the network allow-list; clawk attach resumes the session later.}

The boundary isn't a rule in a prompt the agent could be talked out of. It's a separate machine, and the only openings are the ones you mounted. From a shell inside a sandbox:

$ curl https://tracker.evil.example   # not on the allow-list: blocked
curl: (7) Failed to connect to tracker.evil.example port 443 after 2 ms: Connection refused

$ cat ~/.ssh/id_rsa                   # your keys never entered the VM
cat: /home/agent/.ssh/id_rsa: No such file or directory

$ git push                            # ...yet this works: ssh-agent is forwarded
Enumerating objects: 5, done.

To be honest about the limits, the allow-list blocks connections to unknown servers, not to ones you've allowed: github.com is pre-allowed and the forwarded ssh-agent can push, so treat anything the agent can read as something it could publish. The security model spells this out.

And if the agent wrecks the VM, run clawk destroy && clawk: a fresh VM, same repo, and --resume restores the conversation.

[!IMPORTANT] Pre-1.0 and moving fast. Expect breaking changes between releases and the occasional rough edge; things can and will break. Please file issues; that feedback is shaping 1.0.

Highlights

• Let the agent do anything. It runs in a disposable VM with a restricted network, so rm -rf, package installs, and untrusted code can't reach your host, your files, or anything you didn't explicitly share.
• Working in one command. cd into a repo and run clawk. No Dockerfile, devcontainer, or setup file. First boot builds a rootfs from your image; every boot after takes seconds.
• Break it without losing anything. Destroy and recreate freely; your code and the agent's conversations live on the host. Only the disposable VM disk is lost.
• A real Linux box, your toolchain. Any OCI image is the rootfs: a full OS with exactly the tools your project needs. No Docker daemon required.
• Secrets stay on your machine. Outbound traffic is allow-listed and your ssh-agent is forwarded, so git push works without keys entering the VM.
• A sandbox per project or ticket. Run several at once; multi-repo tickets get a git worktree per repo with coordinated PRs. Idle VMs automatically release memory and suspend to disk, so a forgotten sandbox costs (almost) nothing.

Why a VM?

clawk is a general-purpose local environment for autonomous coding agents. The VM is the point: it's a whole machine the agent can own, not a process wrapped in policy on the one you're using.

• A separate kernel. The guest runs its own Linux kernel, so the host filesystem isn't hidden behind deny rules; it was never mounted.
• A conventional Linux environment. Standard kernel, standard userland, /dev/kvm-shaped expectations, so tools behave the way their docs say, without a syscall-filter surprise.
• Root in the guest. Install system packages, edit /etc, load a module, bind a privileged port. It's the agent's box to reconfigure.
• A disposable lifecycle. Cheap to break and quick to recreate; a wrecked VM is one clawk destroy && clawk away, with your repo and conversations untouched on the host.
• Stronger separation from the host. Isolation rests on the hypervisor boundary rather than on getting a process-sandbox policy exactly right.

That combination runs workloads a restricted process sandbox tends to fight you on:

• installing packages and native dependencies;
• running background services (databases, queues, dev servers);
• executing untrusted builds and tests at full speed;
• using system-level Linux tooling that expects a real machine;
• and, with a KVM-enabled guest kernel on supported hardware, container and Kubernetes dev workflows such as Docker or Kind running inside the sandbox. This is opt-in and hardware-gated; see Images for the exact requirements.

None of this is the product; clawk is for local agent work in general. Docker and Kubernetes are just the sharpest example of "needs a real machine, not a sandboxed process."

Install

Requires macOS 14+ on Apple silicon. (Linux is supported via firecracker and currently experimental — start with docs/linux-quickstart.md, which covers setup, the workflow, and the gaps. This README is macOS-first.)

brew install clawkwork/tap/clawk

From source (contributors, or if you don't use Homebrew), needs Go 1.26+:

git clone https://github.com/clawkwork/clawk && cd clawk
make install

Either way there's no extra host tooling: no Docker, no qemu, no sudo. The hypervisor is Apple's Virtualization.framework, linked into the binary, and the release binaries carry the in-guest agent prebuilt — so a Go toolchain is only needed if you build from source, in which case you have one. First run probes for anything missing and offers to fix it.

Uninstall: clawk destroy your sandboxes, rm -rf ~/.clawk, then remove the binary with brew uninstall clawk (or delete it from $GOBIN for a source install). Nothing else was installed: there are no launchd jobs; the per-sandbox daemons are ordinary processes that exit with their VMs.

Quickstart

The everyday case, a sandbox for the directory you're in: