Skip to content
KitploitKITPLOIT
ToolsExploitsBlog
Log in
Submit
ToolsExploitsBlog
Submit

Hacking, PenTest, and Cybersecurity Tools for Your Security Arsenal!

Kitploit is a directory of hacking, cybersecurity, and pentesting tools. Discover the latest project updates to find vulnerabilities, analyze systems, automate testing, and strengthen your security.

FeedsContactPrivacy© 2026 Kitploit

Tool Directory

Categories

View all categories
Loading categories
CVE-2026-1581-Analysis-Lab — Reproduces CVE-2026-1581, an unauthenticated time-based SQL injection in wpForo Forum <=2.4.14, with a Docker lab and PoC to demonstrate the vulnerability and verify the patch. | Kitploit
Tools/GitHubGitHub/rootdirective-sec/cve-2026-1581-analysis-lab
Vulnerability AnalysisExploitationWeb Application ExploitationPenetration TestingLearning & EducationLabs & Practice
GitHubrootdirective-sec/cve-2026-1581-analysis-lab

CVE-2026-1581-Analysis-Lab

Reproduces CVE-2026-1581, an unauthenticated time-based SQL injection in wpForo Forum <=2.4.14, with a Docker lab and PoC to demonstrate the vulnerability and verify the patch.

View Repository
1127 months agoNot yet reviewed

Most Popular

View all →

Discover the most used tools by our community.

Explore all tools

Browse our collection of tools

View all tools →
Share

CVE-2026-1581 — wpForo Forum (<= 2.4.14) Unauthenticated Time‑Based SQL Injection (ORDER BY)

ภาษาไทย


Executive Summary

FieldDetail
CVE IDCVE-2026-1581
PluginwpForo Forum
Affected Versions<= 2.4.14
Patched Version2.4.15
Vulnerability TypeUnauthenticated Time-Based SQL Injection (ORDER BY)
CVSS Score7.5 (High)
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
  • CVE-2026-1581 is an Unauthenticated Time-Based SQL Injection vulnerability in the wpForo Forum plugin (<= 2.4.14). The wpfob parameter is used in an ORDER BY clause with only text sanitization applied, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to inject arbitrary SQL expressions and read data from the database.

  • The vendor fixed this in version 2.4.15 by replacing sanitize_text_field() with wpforo_sanitize_orderby(), which enforces a context-aware whitelist.


Scope & Safety

  • Run in localhost + Docker Compose only.

  • The PoC is a time-based timing proof to demonstrate the difference between the vulnerable and patched versions.

  • Do not use against any system without explicit authorization.


Evidence at a Glance

  • Version proof: The /community/ page loads /wp-content/plugins/wpforo/assets/js/frontend.js?ver=2.4.14 (vuln) vs 2.4.15 (patched).

  • Code proof: sanitize_text_field(WPF()->GET['wpfob']) → wpforo_sanitize_orderby(..., context, default)

  • Behavior proof: wpfob=modified,(SELECT SLEEP(5)) causes ~5s delay on the vulnerable version; the patched version responds near baseline.


What I Observed from the CVE Advisory

  • The CVE advisory only states that this is a time-based SQL injection via the wpfob parameter, fixed in 2.4.15. At the time of analysis, no public PoC was available.

  • This write-up was therefore built through source code diffing between 2.4.14 and 2.4.15, tracing the parameter from HTTP input through sanitization to the point where it is used to construct the SQL query — in order to understand the root cause and reproduce the issue.

vulnx CVE-2026-1581


1) Source‑Code Driven Analysis

1.1 Locating wpfob

Starting with a grep for wpfob in the source code, it was found that the Recent page takes the value directly from a GET parameter and assigns it as the orderby argument.

find wpfob

Vulnerable (2.4.14) — themes/classic/recent.php:

  32 | $args['orderby']   = ( ! empty( WPF()->GET['wpfob'] ) ) ? sanitize_text_field( WPF()->GET['wpfob'] ) : 'modified';
  74 | $args['orderby']   = ( ! empty( WPF()->GET['wpfob'] ) ) ? sanitize_text_field( WPF()->GET['wpfob'] ) : 'created';

Patched (2.4.15) — same file, sanitizer replaced:

  32 | $args['orderby']   = ( ! empty( WPF()->GET['wpfob'] ) ) ? wpforo_sanitize_orderby( WPF()->GET['wpfob'], 'topics', 'modified' ) : 'modified';
  74 | $args['orderby']   = ( ! empty( WPF()->GET['wpfob'] ) ) ? wpforo_sanitize_orderby( WPF()->GET['wpfob'], 'posts', 'created' ) : 'created';

Why focus on recent.php? Because it is a triggerable route where wpfob is assigned directly to $args['orderby'].


1.2 Dataflow to SQL: ORDER BY ...

Once $args['orderby'] is set, it flows into wpForo's query builder to construct the ORDER BY clause.

ORDER BY concatenation (vuln 2.4.14)

classes/Topics.php:

SQL builder: ORDER BY concatenation in Topics.php

classes/Posts.php:

SQL builder: ORDER BY concatenation in Posts.php

Explanation

  • sanitize_text_field() only strips/cleans the string — it does not enforce a whitelist of allowed column names.
  • Since orderby is concatenated directly into ORDER BY <orderby>, an attacker can inject arbitrary SQL expressions in the ORDER BY position.

Reference: https://developer.wordpress.org/reference/functions/sanitize_text_field/


1.3 Patch / Diff Highlights (2.4.14 → 2.4.15)

1.3.1 Diff: recent.php

32c32
< 	$args['orderby']   = ( ! empty( WPF()->GET['wpfob'] ) ) ? sanitize_text_field( WPF()->GET['wpfob'] ) : 'modified';
---
> 	$args['orderby']   = ( ! empty( WPF()->GET['wpfob'] ) ) ? wpforo_sanitize_orderby( WPF()->GET['wpfob'], 'topics', 'modified' ) : 'modified';
74c74
< 	$args['orderby']   = ( ! empty( WPF()->GET['wpfob'] ) ) ? sanitize_text_field( WPF()->GET['wpfob'] ) : 'created';
---
> 	$args['orderby']   = ( ! empty( WPF()->GET['wpfob'] ) ) ? wpforo_sanitize_orderby( WPF()->GET['wpfob'], 'posts', 'created' ) : 'created';

1.3.2 Diff: wpforo.php

1036c1036
< 					$args['orderby'] = sanitize_text_field( $get['wpfob'] );
---
> 					$args['orderby'] = wpforo_sanitize_orderby( $get['wpfob'], 'search', 'relevancy' );
1077c1077
< 					$args['orderby']   = ( ! empty( WPF()->GET['wpfob'] ) ) ? sanitize_text_field( WPF()->GET['wpfob'] ) : 'modified';
---
> 					$args['orderby']   = ( ! empty( WPF()->GET['wpfob'] ) ) ? wpforo_sanitize_orderby( WPF()->GET['wpfob'], 'topics', 'modified' ) : 'modified';
1153c1153
< 					$args['orderby']   = ( ! empty( WPF()->GET['wpfob'] ) ) ? sanitize_text_field( WPF()->GET['wpfob'] ) : 'created';
---
> 					$args['orderby']   = ( ! empty( WPF()->GET['wpfob'] ) ) ? wpforo_sanitize_orderby( WPF()->GET['wpfob'], 'posts', 'created' ) : 'created';

1.3.3 New patch function: wpforo_sanitize_orderby()

Version 2.4.15 introduces a context-aware whitelist sanitizer that returns the default value if the input is not in the allowed list:

whitelistor


2) Lab Design (Vuln vs Patched)

2.1 Services in Docker Compose

  • wp_vuln (WordPress + wpForo 2.4.14) → http://localhost:8081
  • wp_patched (WordPress + wpForo 2.4.15) → http://localhost:8082
  • db_vuln / db_patched (MariaDB)
  • seed_vuln / seed_patched — uses wp-cli to install WordPress, install the plugin, create the /community/ page with [wpforo] shortcode, configure permalinks, generate .htaccess, and create verification artifacts.

2.2 Test Route

From reading the source, wpfob is used explicitly on the recent page:

  • http://localhost:8081/community/recent/?view=opened
  • http://localhost:8082/community/recent/?view=opened

3) Reproduction: Timing Proof

At least 1 topic and 1 post must exist before testing.

3.1 Why "posts are required"

  • This is an ORDER BY injection vulnerability.
  • If wpForo has no topics or posts, the query may return 0 rows — in which case no sorting occurs on the DB side, the code path may not evaluate the ORDER BY expression, and no delay is observed — a false negative.

At least 1 topic and 1 post are required.

3.2 Baseline Timing

curl -sS -L -o /dev/null -w "baseline_vuln=%{time_total}\n" \
  "http://localhost:8081/community/recent/?view=opened"
Download Tool