
Security-research lab reproducing CVE-2020-36762 (GHSA-h9gr-83jq-f3xc): bash command injection via github.event.comment.body in the comment workflow of ONSdigital/ras-collection-instrument
Automated research artifact — not the upstream project.
This repository is a disposable lab built by an automated harness for a master's thesis at Université Laval on reproducing published GitHub Actions workflow vulnerabilities. It is a verbatim snapshot of
ONSdigital/ras-collection-instrumentat commit493dc3d7c85f39c44e879941df9d5682865da109(2020-12-03), redistributed under that project's own licence, whose file is included unchanged in this snapshot.The upstream project is not involved, is never targeted, and the vulnerability studied here is already public. Every secret and variable in this repository is a randomly generated dummy value — no real credential is present. Action references and runner images are pinned to what they resolved to on 2020-12-03; see
pinning.mdin the harness output for every change made to the snapshot.Questions or objections: [email protected]
This is the RAS Collection Instrument micro-service, responsible for the uploading of collection exercises and instruments. It can also be used to download collection instruments as .xlsx files, and allows for the searching of collection instruments via search filters. This service has the ability to link and unlink collection exercises with collection instruments. The relationship between exercises and instruments is one-to-many, so one collection exercise can have multiple collection instruments. Each collection instrument in the JSON schema has a sample unit reference, type, and summary ID, as well as additional attributes. This service commmunicates primarily with the collection exercise service, as well as the party, case, and survey services. Logging information about the collection instruments is sent to rabbitmq.
Collection instruments are stored in an instrument table with the following fields:
type = the type of the collection exercise (i.e. SEFT, EQ, etc.) instrument_id = the UUID for the instrument stamp = the timestamp showing when the collection instrument was created survey_id = the UUID of the associated survey classifiers = the survey classifiers survey = the survey itself seft_file = the instrument's seft file
Three different endpoint views exist: /collectioninstrument, which is used for the majority of the endpoints, as well as /survey_responses and /info.
When a collection instrument is uploaded for a collection exercise it writes a message onto the Seft.Instruments queue for the rm-collection-exercise service When a SEFT survey response is uploaded, it writes a message onto the Seft.Responses queue for sdx-seft-consumer service
This requires pipenv to be installed:
pip install pipenv
To run the tests a rabbitmq and database server is required. The tox script creates and runs these dependencies inside Docker containers, which are destroyed after the unit tests are run.
pipenv install --dev
pipenv run tox
To run the service with the required dependencies:
docker-compose up -d db rabbitmq
pipenv run python run.py
To test the service is up:
curl http://localhost:8082/info
The database will automatically be created when starting the application.
To run the service in a Docker container a Compose script is included:
docker-compose up -d
Environment variables available for configuration are listed below:
| Environment Variable | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|
| MAX_UPLOAD_FILE_NAME_LENGTH | Maximum length of file names | 50 |
| LOGGING_LEVEL | Level of the logger | INFO |
| JSON_SECRET_KEYS | Json representation of keys | None |
| ONS_CRYPTOKEY | A key used by the Cryptographer | None |
| SECURITY_USER_NAME | Username the client uses to authenticate with other apis | admin |
| SECURITY_USER_PASSWORD | Password the client uses to authenticate with other apis | secret |
| COLLECTION_EXERCISE_SCHEMA | Location of the collection instrument schema | application/schemas/collection_instrument_schema.json |
| CASE_URL | URL for the case service | 'http://localhost:8171' |
| COLLECTION_EXERCISE_URL | URL for the collection exercise service | 'http://localhost:8145' |
| SURVEY_SERVICE_URL | URL for the survey service | 'http://localhost:8080' |
| PARTY_URL | URL for the party service | 'http://localhost:8081' |
| RABBITMQ_AMQP_COLLECTION_INSTRUMENT | URI for rabbitmq | None |
| RABBITMQ_AMQP_SURVEY_RESPONSE | URI for rabbitmq | None |
These are set in config.py
Navigate to /developer_scripts and run import.py, answer the prompts on the command line
collection_instrument_schema has two seemingly identical attribute fields: formType and formtype.entname1/2/3 and runame1/2/3, among others. The schema should be redesigned, or have more specific documentation./collectioninstrument/count endpoint does is return the number of collection instruments. Why is this something the service needs to do? Could this not be accomplished by a database query?