
Ansible playbook for detecting and remediating CVE-2026-31431 (Copy Fail) - Linux kernel local privilege escalation vulnerability
Copy Fail Detection and Remediation
An Ansible role and playbook suite for detecting and remediating CVE-2026-31431 (Copy Fail), a critical local privilege escalation vulnerability in the Linux kernel's algif_aead module.
🔗 GitHub: https://github.com/parmstro/cfDr
The name cfDr is a play on "Copy Fail Doctor" - your trusted remedy for CVE-2026-31431.
CVE-2026-31431 (CVSS 7.8) is a logic flaw in the Linux kernel's AEAD socket interface (AF_ALG) discovered in 2026. The vulnerability allows any unprivileged local user to escalate privileges to root in seconds.
algif_aead kernel module (AF_ALG crypto interface)Kernel Versions: Linux kernel >= 4.10 (released 2017)
Distributions Affected:
Note: Any Linux distribution with kernel 4.10 or newer is potentially vulnerable.
This vulnerability is particularly dangerous because:
Once an attacker has any form of local access (SSH, web shell, container escape, etc.), they can:
While waiting for vendor-supplied kernel patches, several mitigation strategies are available. cfDr implements all of them, with intelligent recommendations based on your system configuration.
Not all remediations are equal. Here's what you need to know:
| Method | Can Root Bypass? | Coverage | Enterprise Linux Support |
|---|---|---|---|
| Module Blacklist | ✅ Yes (via insmod) | Prevents modprobe loading | All versions |
| SELinux Policy | ❌ NO (LSM layer) | Configured domains only | All versions (default) |
| systemd seccomp | ❌ NO (syscall filter) | Configured services only | All versions |
| eBPF LSM | ❌ NO (LSM layer) | System-wide (if configured) | RHEL 9+, Fedora 34+ |
cfDr's default recommendation: Flag 3 (Module Blacklist + SELinux)
This provides two independent protection layers:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Layer 1: Module Blacklist │
│ • Prevents modprobe algif_aead │
│ • Persists across reboots │
│ • CAN be bypassed by malicious root (insmod) │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Layer 2: SELinux Policy │
│ • Blocks AF_ALG socket() at syscall level │
│ • Works even if module is loaded │
│ • CANNOT be bypassed from userspace │
│ • Covers user_t, unconfined_t (majority cases) │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Result: If either layer fails, the other still protects
A determined attacker with root access can bypass module blacklisting:
# Module blacklist DOES NOT prevent:
insmod /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/kernel/crypto/algif_aead.ko.xz
However, this is acceptable because:
For complete, non-bypassable protection, you need:
Module Blacklist + at least one of:
cfDr uses bitwise flags to enable multiple mitigations:
| Flag Value | Mitigations Enabled | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Module Blacklist only | Minimal protection, systems without SELinux |
| 2 | SELinux only | SELinux-only environments |
| 3 | Module Blacklist + SELinux | RECOMMENDED default |
| 5 | Module Blacklist + seccomp | Non-SELinux with service hardening |
| 7 | Module Blacklist + SELinux + seccomp | Enhanced protection |
| 15 | All mitigations | Maximum protection (RHEL 9+ only) |
Calculate flags: 1 (blacklist) + 2 (SELinux) + 4 (seccomp) + 8 (eBPF) = sum
SELinux Protection:
user_t, unconfined_t, httpd_t, postgresql_t, mysqld_tuser_t and unconfined_t cover the vast majority of attack scenariossystemd seccomp Protection:
httpd, nginx, postgresql, mariadb, redis, memcachedeBPF LSM Protection:
cfDr performs comprehensive assessment across multiple dimensions:
uname -r
modinfo algif_aead
algif_aead module exists in the kernellsmod | grep algif_aead
lsof -U | grep AF_ALG
Module Blacklist:
grep -E "blacklist algif_aead|install algif_aead" /etc/modprobe.d/*.conf
SELinux Policy:
semodule -l | grep cve_2026_31431_af_alg_deny
systemd seccomp:
systemctl show <service> | grep RestrictAddressFamilies
cfDr categorizes each host into one of these states:
| Status | Condition | Action Required |
|---|---|---|
| VULNERABLE - Module loaded | Kernel >= 4.10, module exists AND loaded | IMMEDIATE - Actively exploitable |
| VULNERABLE - Module exists | Kernel >= 4.10, module exists, not loaded | HIGH - Can be loaded and exploited |
| MITIGATED - Module blacklisted | Blacklist detected | LOW - Monitor, apply additional layers |
| PROTECTED - Defense-in-depth | Blacklist + SELinux/seccomp/eBPF | NONE - Fully protected |
| NOT VULNERABLE - Old kernel | Kernel < 4.10 | NONE - Predates vulnerability |
| NOT VULNERABLE - No module | algif_aead module not in kernel | NONE - Module not available |
Each host receives:
/root/cve-2026-31431-assessment-<hostname>.txt/tmp/cve-2026-31431-<hostname>.jsonExample brief output:
webserver1.example.com: VULNERABLE - Module exists and can be loaded
dbserver2.example.com: PROTECTED - Defense-in-depth (Module Blacklist + SELinux)
appserver3.example.com: NOT VULNERABLE - Module not available
cfDr is built as a modern Ansible role with multiple playbook entry points:
cfDr/
├── roles/
│ └── cve_2026_31431/ # Main role
│ ├── tasks/
│ │ ├── main.yml # Role orchestration
│ │ ├── assessment.yml # Vulnerability detection
│ │ ├── remediation_module_blacklist.yml
│ │ ├── remediation_selinux.yml
│ │ ├── remediation_seccomp.yml
│ │ ├── remediation_ebpf.yml
│ │ ├── reporting.yml # Status reporting
│ │ └── inventory_update.yml # Inventory generation
│ ├── templates/ # Config file templates
│ ├── defaults/ # Default variables
│ └── handlers/ # Service restarts, etc.
├── quickstart.yml # Simplest usage
├── sample_playbook.yml # Multiple examples
└── cve_2026_31431_playbook.yml # Full-featured playbook
1. Pre-flight checks
↓
2. Gather system facts
↓
3. Detect kernel version
↓
4. Check module availability
↓
5. Check current load status
↓
6. Check existing mitigations
↓
7. Determine vulnerability status
↓
8. Flag vulnerable hosts
↓
9. Generate reports
↓
10. Create summary
↓
11. [Optional] Generate inventory
apply_remediation=true)1-8. [Same as Assessment Mode]
↓
9. Apply Module Blacklist (if flag 1)
• Unload module if loaded
• Create blacklist config
• Update initramfs/initrd
• Verify blacklist works
↓
10. Apply SELinux Policy (if flag 2)
• Install policy packages
• Compile policy module
• Install policy
• Verify policy active
↓
11. Apply systemd seccomp (if flag 4)
• Create drop-in files
• Reload systemd
• Restart services
• Verify filters active
↓
12. Apply eBPF LSM (if flag 8)
• Compile eBPF program
• Load into kernel
• Verify program attached
↓
13. Re-assess protection status
↓
14. Generate reports
↓
15. Create summary
What it does:
algif_aead module if currently loaded (rmmod algif_aead)/etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-algif_aead-cve-2026-31431.conf:
blacklist algif_aead
install algif_aead /bin/true
update-initramfs -udracut -fmodprobeProtection: Immediate, no reboot required Persistence: Survives reboots and kernel updates
What it does:
policycoreutilspolicycoreutils-python-utilsselinux-policy-develcheckpolicysemodule -i cve_2026_31431_af_alg_deny.ppDomains protected (default):
user_t - Regular user processesunconfined_t - Unconfined processeshttpd_t - Apache web serverpostgresql_t - PostgreSQL databasemysqld_t - MySQL/MariaDB databaseProtection: Blocks at LSM layer, cannot be bypassed Persistence: Policy survives reboots
What it does:
/etc/systemd/system/<service>.service.d/90-cve-2026-31431-block-af-alg.confRestrictAddressFamilies=~AF_ALG directiveServices protected (default):
httpd, nginx - Web serverspostgresql, mariadb - Databasesredis, memcached - Cache serversProtection: Blocks socket creation at syscall level per service Persistence: Survives reboots and service updates
What it does:
Requirements:
CONFIG_BPF_LSM=yProtection: Dynamic, programmable system-wide policy Persistence: Requires system service to reload on boot
cfDr can generate ready-to-use inventory files containing only vulnerable hosts:
Generated files:
inventory_output/
├── vulnerable_hosts.yml # YAML inventory
├── vulnerable_hosts.ini # INI inventory
├── group_vars_vulnerable_hosts.yml # Group variables
└── host_vars/
├── host1.yml # Per-host details
└── host2.yml
What's included:
Intelligent recommendations:
host_varsConfidence Level: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ HIGH - See IPsec/XFRM Validation Report for comprehensive analysis
Good news for Enterprise Linux deployments: Based on authoritative sources including CERT-EU, CloudLinux, and HPCsec, cfDr's mitigations have minimal to zero impact on standard RHEL system cryptography and services.
The following critical RHEL cryptographic systems do not use AF_ALG and are completely unaffected by our remediations:
| Service/Component | Function | Status |
|---|---|---|
| dm-crypt / LUKS | Full disk encryption | ✅ Unaffected |
| IPsec / XFRM | VPN and encrypted networking | ✅ Unaffected (validated) |
| kTLS | Kernel TLS implementation | ✅ Unaffected |
| SSH | Secure shell connections | ✅ Unaffected |
| Library | Usage | Status |
|---|---|---|
| OpenSSL (default) | SSL/TLS, certificates, general crypto | ✅ Unaffected |
| GnuTLS (default) | TLS implementation | ✅ Unaffected |
| NSS | Mozilla Network Security Services | ✅ Unaffected |
| Kernel keyring | Kernel key management | ✅ Unaffected |
As documented in the Linux Kernel Crypto Documentation, AF_ALG is a userspace socket interface to kernel crypto introduced in Linux 2.6.38. However, most RHEL system services use the kernel crypto API directly rather than going through the AF_ALG socket layer.
According to CERT-EU's security advisory:
"dm-crypt / LUKS, kTLS, IPsec, SSH, and default OpenSSL / GnuTLS builds do not depend on AF_ALG and are unaffected by AF_ALG limitations."
The architecture looks like this:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Userspace Applications │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Standard Crypto Libraries │
│ (OpenSSL, GnuTLS, NSS) │
│ │ │
│ └─────> In-Kernel Crypto API ──────────┐ │
│ (Direct access) │ │
├──────────────────────────────────────────┼──┤
│ AF_ALG Socket Interface (RARELY USED) │ │
│ │ │ │
│ └─────> In-Kernel Crypto API ──────────┘ │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Kernel Crypto Subsystem │
│ (AES, SHA, AEAD algorithms) │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Standard services bypass AF_ALG entirely
According to R-fx Networks analysis:
"For most HPC environments, this will break nothing – AF_ALG is a userspace front-door to kernel crypto that almost nothing actually uses."
Only these extremely rare configurations might be affected:
NOT default on RHEL. The afalg engine must be explicitly configured:
# Check if afalg engine is enabled (rare)
openssl engine afalg
# If this returns "afalg is not available", you're safe
Use case: Hardware crypto acceleration offload
Prevalence: Extremely rare in standard deployments
Impact: Application falls back to software crypto
Direct AF_ALG socket programming using specialized libraries.
Use case: Specialized security tools or custom crypto applications
Prevalence: Almost non-existent in standard enterprise environments
Impact: Application-specific, would need code modification
Specialized tools that use AF_ALG for hardware acceleration.
Use case: High-performance computing, cryptographic hardware accelerators
Prevalence: Only in specialized high-security or HPC environments
Impact: Fall back to software crypto
According to Red Hat Bugzilla #2460538:
| Flag | Mitigations | Impact on Standard Services |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Module Blacklist | ✅ Zero impact - AF_ALG not used |
| 2 | SELinux Policy | ✅ Zero impact - Blocks unused syscall |
| 3 | Blacklist + SELinux | ✅ Zero impact - RECOMMENDED |
| 5 | Blacklist + seccomp | ✅ Zero impact - Per-service safe |
| 7 | Blacklist + SELinux + seccomp | ✅ Zero impact - Defense-in-depth |
| 15 | All mitigations | ✅ Zero impact - Maximum protection |
After applying cfDr mitigations, verify critical services continue operating:
# Test SSH connectivity
ssh localhost echo "SSH working"
# Test HTTPS (if web server running)
curl -k https://localhost
# Test LUKS encryption (if using encrypted volumes)
cryptsetup status /dev/mapper/luks-volume
# Test IPsec (if VPN configured)
ipsec status
# Test system services
systemctl status sshd
systemctl status httpd
systemctl status postgresql
# Check for any service failures
systemctl --failed
Expected result: All services continue functioning normally.
Multiple authoritative security organizations confirm our assessment:
CERT-EU (April 30, 2026):
"dm-crypt / LUKS, kTLS, IPsec, SSH, and default OpenSSL / GnuTLS builds do not depend on AF_ALG"
Sysdig (April 29, 2026):
Documents that standard crypto operations use in-kernel APIs, not AF_ALG sockets
R-fx Networks (May 2, 2026):
"Hosting workloads do not legitimately use AF_ALG, making it safe to disable as a mitigation without impacting production services"
HPCsec (April 30, 2026):
"For most HPC environments, this will break nothing – AF_ALG is a userspace front-door to kernel crypto that almost nothing actually uses"
For Standard RHEL/CentOS/Fedora Environments:
Decision Matrix:
| Your Environment | Recommendation | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Standard RHEL servers | Deploy Flag 3 now | Zero impact, immediate protection |
| RHEL with custom crypto | Audit for AF_ALG usage first | Extremely unlikely, but verify |
| Development systems | Deploy Flag 3 now | Same as production |
| High-security environments | Deploy Flag 7 or 15 | Maximum defense-in-depth |
cfDr's remediations are safe for all standard RHEL deployments. The algif_aead module and AF_ALG socket interface are not used by any critical system cryptography on Enterprise Linux systems.
What this means:
The only theoretical risk is to custom applications explicitly programmed to use AF_ALG sockets - a scenario so rare that multiple security organizations independently confirmed it's safe to block AF_ALG in enterprise environments.
This workflow balances thoroughness with operational safety:
# Scan all hosts without making changes
ansible-playbook -i inventory quickstart.yml
What happens:
Review:
/root/cve-2026-31431-assessment-<hostname>.txt on each hostExpected output:
CVE-2026-31431 Summary Report
==========================================
Total hosts scanned: 50
Vulnerable hosts: 12
VULNERABLE HOSTS REQUIRING REMEDIATION:
web1.example.com, web2.example.com, db1.example.com, ...
DEFAULT RECOMMENDED MITIGATION: Flag 3
- Module Blacklist (1) + SELinux (2) = Defense-in-depth
- Module Blacklist alone can be bypassed by root (via insmod)
- SELinux blocks syscall even if blacklist is bypassed
- Covers user_t/unconfined_t (vast majority of scenarios)
# Create inventory of vulnerable hosts with recommendations
ansible-playbook -i inventory quickstart.yml -e generate_inventory=true -e inventory_output_dir=./vulnerable_hosts
What happens:
Review:
# Check generated inventory
cat vulnerable_hosts/vulnerable_hosts.yml
# Review per-host recommendations
ls vulnerable_hosts/host_vars/
# Apply to test/dev hosts first
ansible-playbook -i vulnerable_hosts/vulnerable_hosts.yml cve_2026_31431_playbook.yml \
-e apply_remediation=true \
--limit 'dev*:test*'
What happens:
Verify:
# Re-scan test hosts
ansible-playbook -i vulnerable_hosts/vulnerable_hosts.yml quickstart.yml --limit 'dev*:test*'
# Check for "PROTECTED - Defense-in-depth" status
Test applications:
# Apply to production in stages
# Stage 1: Web tier
ansible-playbook -i vulnerable_hosts/vulnerable_hosts.yml cve_2026_31431_playbook.yml \
-e apply_remediation=true \
--limit 'web*'
# Stage 2: Application tier
ansible-playbook -i vulnerable_hosts/vulnerable_hosts.yml cve_2026_31431_playbook.yml \
-e apply_remediation=true \
--limit 'app*'
# Stage 3: Database tier (most critical)
ansible-playbook -i vulnerable_hosts/vulnerable_hosts.yml cve_2026_31431_playbook.yml \
-e apply_remediation=true \
--limit 'db*'
What happens:
Monitor between stages:
# Final assessment of all hosts
ansible-playbook -i inventory quickstart.yml
Document:
Expected final output:
CVE-2026-31431 Summary Report
==========================================
Total hosts scanned: 50
Vulnerable hosts: 0
All hosts protected with defense-in-depth mitigations
For actively exploited systems or immediate threats:
# Immediate assessment and remediation
ansible-playbook -i inventory quickstart.yml -e apply_remediation=true -e mitigation_flags=3
# Re-verify all hosts
ansible-playbook -i inventory quickstart.yml
Use this approach when:
Caution: This applies mitigations to ALL vulnerable hosts simultaneously. Monitor closely.
For ongoing compliance and new system detection:
# Weekly automated scan
0 2 * * 0 ansible-playbook -i inventory quickstart.yml -e generate_inventory=true
# Alert on new vulnerabilities
# (integrate with monitoring system)
Integrate with:
For specific requirements beyond Flag 3:
# Use enhanced protection (Flag 7: Blacklist + SELinux + seccomp)
ansible-playbook -i inventory quickstart.yml \
-e apply_remediation=true \
-e mitigation_flags=7
# Or customize per-host via inventory
# Edit generated host_vars/*.yml files to set custom flags
vim vulnerable_hosts/host_vars/web1.example.com.yml
# Change: recommended_mitigation_flags: 7
# Apply customized settings
ansible-playbook -i vulnerable_hosts/vulnerable_hosts.yml cve_2026_31431_playbook.yml \
-e apply_remediation=true
After remediation, verify protection:
# On remediated host:
sudo lsmod | grep algif_aead
# Should return nothing (module not loaded)
sudo modprobe algif_aead
# Should fail: "modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'algif_aead'"
cat /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-algif_aead-cve-2026-31431.conf
# Should show blacklist configuration
# Check SELinux policy
sudo semodule -l | grep cve_2026_31431
# Should show: cve_2026_31431_af_alg_deny
# Check seccomp (for services)
systemctl show httpd | grep RestrictAddressFamilies
# Should show: RestrictAddressFamilies=~AF_ALG
For users who want to get started immediately:
# Clone repository
git clone https://github.com/parmstro/cfDr.git
cd cfDr
# Step 1: Assess all hosts
ansible-playbook -i inventory quickstart.yml
# Step 2: Apply recommended mitigations to vulnerable hosts
ansible-playbook -i inventory quickstart.yml --limit vulnerable_hosts -e apply_remediation=true
# Assess with your inventory
ansible-playbook -i /path/to/your/inventory quickstart.yml
# Remediate vulnerable hosts
ansible-playbook -i /path/to/your/inventory quickstart.yml \
--limit vulnerable_hosts \
-e apply_remediation=true
# Scan and create inventory of vulnerable hosts
ansible-playbook -i inventory quickstart.yml -e generate_inventory=true
# Review generated files
ls inventory_output/
# Apply mitigations using generated inventory
ansible-playbook -i inventory_output/vulnerable_hosts.yml cve_2026_31431_playbook.yml \
-e apply_remediation=true
Override default mitigations per playbook run:
# Module blacklist only
ansible-playbook quickstart.yml -e apply_remediation=true -e mitigation_flags=1
# SELinux only
ansible-playbook quickstart.yml -e apply_remediation=true -e mitigation_flags=2
# Module blacklist + SELinux (default recommended)
ansible-playbook quickstart.yml -e apply_remediation=true -e mitigation_flags=3
# Enhanced: Blacklist + SELinux + seccomp
ansible-playbook quickstart.yml -e apply_remediation=true -e mitigation_flags=7
# Maximum: All mitigations (RHEL 9+ only)
ansible-playbook quickstart.yml -e apply_remediation=true -e mitigation_flags=15
Edit roles/cve_2026_31431/defaults/main.yml:
# Add additional domains to protect
selinux_denied_domains:
- user_t
- unconfined_t
- httpd_t
- postgresql_t
- mysqld_t
- custom_app_t # Your custom domain
- another_service_t
Edit roles/cve_2026_31431/defaults/main.yml:
# Add additional services to protect
seccomp_protected_services:
- httpd
- nginx
- postgresql
- mariadb
- redis
- memcached
- your-custom-service # Your service
# Specify custom output location
ansible-playbook quickstart.yml \
-e generate_inventory=true \
-e inventory_output_dir=/path/to/output
The sample_playbook.yml contains multiple examples:
# Example 1: Assessment only
- hosts: all
roles:
- cve_2026_31431
# Example 2: Module blacklist only
- hosts: all
vars:
apply_remediation: true
mitigation_flags: 1
roles:
- cve_2026_31431
# Example 3: Recommended (Blacklist + SELinux)
- hosts: all
vars:
apply_remediation: true
mitigation_flags: 3
roles:
- cve_2026_31431
Official Sources:
Security Research and Analysis:
Community contributions to CVE-2026-31431 mitigation:
block-copyfail - eBPF LSM implementation by Anthony Green
Blastwall - SELinux policy framework by Greg Procunier
Knowledge Base Articles:
Mitigation Guides:
cfDr Extended Documentation:
Ansible Documentation:
Primary Source: Red Hat Customer Portal
Notification Methods:
Email Alerts (Recommended):
RSS Feeds:
API Access:
# Check for kernel security updates
curl -H "Accept: application/json" \
"https://access.redhat.com/labs/securitydataapi/cve/CVE-2026-31431.json"
Automated Monitoring:
# Install Red Hat Security Advisories plugin for yum
sudo yum install yum-plugin-security
# Check for security updates
sudo yum updateinfo list security
# Check specifically for kernel updates
sudo yum updateinfo list security kernel
What to look for:
Example Advisory Format:
RHSA-2026:XXXX - Important: kernel security update
Severity: Important
CVEs: CVE-2026-31431
Affected Products: RHEL 7, 8, 9
CentOS Stream:
Rocky Linux:
AlmaLinux:
Primary Source: Fedora Project
Notification Methods:
# Subscribe to security announcements
# Visit: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/security-announce.lists.fedoraproject.org/
# Check for updates
sudo dnf check-update kernel
# View available security updates
sudo dnf updateinfo list security
Primary Source: Ubuntu Security Notices
Notification Methods:
# Subscribe to security announcements
# Visit: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-security-announce
# Check for security updates
sudo apt update
sudo apt list --upgradable | grep security
# Ubuntu Security Notices tool
sudo apt install ubuntu-security-tools
usn list --cve CVE-2026-31431
Primary Source: Debian Security Tracker
Notification Methods:
# Subscribe to Debian Security Announcements
# Visit: https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/
# Check for security updates
sudo apt update
sudo apt list --upgradable
Primary Source: SUSE Security
Notification Methods:
# Check for security patches
sudo zypper list-patches --category security
# Specific CVE check
sudo zypper info --cve CVE-2026-31431
Linux Kernel Mailing List:
Git Repository:
# Monitor kernel git for patches
git clone https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
# Search for CVE-2026-31431 patches
git log --all --grep="CVE-2026-31431"
Create a monitoring script for your environment:
#!/bin/bash
# check-cve-2026-31431-patch.sh
# Monitors for CVE-2026-31431 kernel patches
DISTRO=$(grep ^ID= /etc/os-release | cut -d= -f2 | tr -d '"')
case $DISTRO in
rhel|centos|rocky|alma)
yum updateinfo list security kernel 2>/dev/null | grep -i CVE-2026-31431
;;
fedora)
dnf updateinfo list security kernel 2>/dev/null | grep -i CVE-2026-31431
;;
ubuntu|debian)
apt-get update -qq
apt-cache show linux-image-$(uname -r) | grep CVE-2026-31431
;;
sles|opensuse*)
zypper info --cve CVE-2026-31431 kernel-default
;;
esac
# Check Red Hat Security Data API
curl -s "https://access.redhat.com/labs/securitydataapi/cve/CVE-2026-31431.json" | \
jq -r '.affected_release[] | select(.package | startswith("kernel")) |
"\(.product_name): \(.advisory) - \(.package)"'
Schedule with cron:
# Check daily for patches
0 6 * * * /usr/local/bin/check-cve-2026-31431-patch.sh | mail -s "CVE-2026-31431 Patch Check" [email protected]
Verify patch availability:
# Check your distribution's update mechanism
sudo yum check-update kernel # RHEL/CentOS/Fedora
sudo apt update && apt list --upgradable linux-image-* # Ubuntu/Debian
Review release notes:
Test in non-production:
# Apply kernel update to test systems first
sudo yum update kernel # RHEL/CentOS/Fedora
sudo apt upgrade linux-image-* # Ubuntu/Debian
sudo reboot
Verify patch effectiveness:
# After reboot, verify kernel version
uname -r
# Run cfDr assessment to confirm patch
ansible-playbook -i inventory quickstart.yml
Plan production rollout:
Remove temporary mitigations (optional):
# After patching, temporary mitigations can be removed
# However, defense-in-depth recommends keeping them
# If you choose to remove:
sudo rm /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-algif_aead-cve-2026-31431.conf
sudo semodule -r cve_2026_31431_af_alg_deny # SELinux policy
# Remove seccomp drop-in files
# Update initramfs/initrd
Recommendation: Even after kernel patching, consider keeping defense-in-depth mitigations in place as protection against future vulnerabilities.
Found a bug or have a feature request?
We welcome contributions! See docs/CONTRIBUTORS.md for:
cfDr is built on the collective expertise of security professionals:
See docs/CONTRIBUTORS.md for complete contribution details.
This project is provided under the MIT License for vulnerability assessment and remediation purposes.
See LICENSE for details.
IMPORTANT: This tool provides temporary mitigations while waiting for vendor-supplied kernel patches. These mitigations significantly reduce risk but may not provide complete protection in all scenarios.
cfDr is provided "as is" without warranty. Always:
The contributors and maintainers of cfDr are not responsible for any damage or data loss resulting from the use of this tool.
Last Updated: 2026-05-02T23:30:00Z