
Dahua CVE-2026-29114
Advisory type: Vendor-coordinated security disclosure
CVE ID: CVE-2026-29114
Vendor: Dahua Technology
Published: 2026-06-10T05:44:50 UTC
Last Modified: 2026-06-10T05:44:50 UTC
Source: Dahua Product Security Incident (PSI) Trust Center
A low-severity certificate-trust vulnerability has been identified in select Dahua IPC (IP camera) models. Under certain deployment conditions, a remote attacker can obtain the device's internal CA root certificate — material that should remain private to the certificate authority hierarchy.
If that root CA (or an intermediate derived from it) has been installed and trusted on client workstations, browsers, or middleware, an attacker who possesses the private key material can mint fraudulent X.509 certificates that validating clients will accept as legitimate. That enables person-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks against HTTPS or TLS-protected sessions that chain to the compromised trust anchor, undermining the confidentiality and integrity of affected client connections.
The published CVSS 4.0 base score is 2.3 (LOW). The relatively low score reflects deployment preconditions (AT:P — attack requirements present) and passive user interaction (UI:P) needed for practical impact, plus Low (not High) direct confidentiality and integrity ratings on the vulnerable device itself. Availability is not impacted (VA:N).
Organizations running affected IPC firmware builds before April 15, 2026 should verify whether device-issued CAs were ever distributed to endpoints, remove untrusted roots from client trust stores, rotate TLS configurations, and upgrade firmware.
Note on advisory labeling: Some indexes title this CVE "Dahua Data Breach." The vendor description concerns exposure of a device CA root certificate and downstream PKI trust abuse — not bulk exfiltration of recorded video or customer databases. This document follows the vendor description and CVSS scoring data.
CVE-2026-29114 was published on 2026-06-10 alongside other Dahua PSI disclosures from the same batch. The issues are distinct in mechanism and impact profile.
Defender takeaway: This CVE is not a camera reboot flaw. It is a PKI hygiene and trust-store problem. Patching matters, but removing improperly trusted device CAs from client machines is often the decisive remediation step.
Dahua has reported a vulnerability in some IPC models whereby sensitive certificate authority (CA) material associated with the device can be obtained by a remote party. The vendor states that an attacker may obtain the device's CA root certificate.
X.509 PKI security depends on private keys staying secret and trust anchors being deliberately chosen. If:
then an attacker can:
Per the published vector:
SC:N, SI:N, SA:N)Practical harm often manifests on client systems that trust the exposed CA, which is why attack requirements and user interaction metrics are elevated in the scoring model.
Many embedded devices ship with factory or firmware-bundled PKI to support:
| Use Case | Typical Role of Device CA |
|---|---|
| HTTPS web UI | Locally signed TLS certificate for https://camera-ip |
| ONVIF / SDK TLS | Encrypted management channels |
| Mobile app pairing | Custom trust for P2P or cloud assist features |
When installers or software packages push the device CA into Windows/macOS/Linux trust stores, every certificate signed by that CA becomes as trusted as a public CA — for those endpoints.
CWE-538 covers placement of sensitive information (keys, passwords, certificates) into files or directories reachable without adequate protection. Here, the CA root certificate (and potentially key material or recoverable signing secrets, depending on implementation — vendor text emphasizes certificate obtainability) is exposed via a network-reachable path without authentication.
AT:P means exploitation or meaningful impact is not universal; additional conditions exist:
| Typical Prerequisite | Explanation |
|---|---|
| Client trust installation | Victim systems must trust the device's CA root |
| Network path to exposed material | Attacker can reach the endpoint serving the certificate |
| TLS reliance on that trust anchor | Users or apps must connect to services validated via the compromised CA |
Without client-side trust, obtaining the CA certificate alone (public component) is often insufficient for MITM — the private key must also be compromised. Vendor language focuses on obtaining the root CA certificate; defenders should assume the full trust chain may be at risk until firmware analysis or vendor errata clarifies key exposure.
CVSS 4.0 Passive interaction means the victim must perform a voluntary but low-friction action — not necessarily clicking a malicious link. Examples include:
The user is not required to actively approve a security exception in all deployment models, but some user-driven TLS usage is in the attack path.
Because PR:N and AV:N, the exposure mechanism is reachable without device credentials. Likely classes of exposure (model-dependent, not vendor-specified):
Penetration testers should map certificate file paths on affected IPC firmware revisions through authorized assessments only.
| # | Vendor | Product Family | Version / Build Guidance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dahua | IPC | Affected: certain IPC models with firmware builds before April 15, 2026 |
Totals: 1 affected vendor · 1 affected product family (IPC, subset of models)
| In Scope | Out of Scope (This CVE) |
|---|---|
| Select IPC models | SD speed domes |
| Build date before 2026-04-15 | NVR, XVR, EVS |
| VTO, VTH, ASI, TPC |
Dahua does not enumerate every model in the CVE summary line. Operators must:
| Score | Version | Severity | Vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.3 | 4.0 | LOW | CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N |
| Factor | Scoring Effect |
|---|---|
Risk management note: A 2.3 LOW CVE can still justify high operational priority if your standard operating procedure distributed device CAs enterprise-wide.
Visual summary of the published CVSS 4.0 selector positions:
Attack Vector: [Network] Adjacent Local Physical
Attack Complexity: [Low] High
Attack Requirements: None [Present]
Privileges Required: [None] Low High
User Interaction: None [Passive] Active
Vuln Confidentiality: None [Low] High
Vuln Integrity: None [Low] High
Vuln Availability: [None] Low High
Subseq Confidentiality: [None] Low High
Subseq Integrity: [None] Low High
Subseq Availability: [None] Low High
| # | CWE ID | Name | Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CWE-538 | Insertion of Sensitive Information into Externally-Accessible File or Directory | Device CA root certificate reachable via insufficiently protected network-accessible storage |
| CWE | Name | Relationship |
|---|---|---|
| CWE-295 | Improper Certificate Validation | Downstream client mis-validation after trust installation |
| CWE-320 | Key Management Errors | If private key material is co-exposed with certificate |
Remotely Exploitable: Yes (certificate retrieval); full trust abuse depends on deployment preconditions above.
An integrator installs Dahua's client suite on 200 operator PCs, importing the device CA root into Windows Trusted Root Certification Authorities. An attacker retrieves the CA cert and signing key from an internet-exposed IPC, then MITMs HTTPS sessions to the corporate VMS portal from a coffee-shop laptop on the same VPN.
Operators are trained to browse https://192.168.x.x for quick focus adjustments. The browser trusts the device-issued chain via a previously imported root. An attacker on the LAN presents a forged certificate for the camera IP, intercepting credentials entered into what appears to be a valid TLS session.
An attacker signs a fake update manifest or plugin host appearing trusted under the compromised CA. Passive users opening the VMS trigger download validation that succeeds under the rogue chain.
Threat actors archive exposed CA material from Shodan-indexed cameras for later use if keys are crackable, leaked in firmware images, or if clients later install trust during expansion projects.
No active attacker — auditors discover publicly retrievable CA files on field IPCs, failing PKI governance controls and triggering mandatory rotation even without evidence of exploitation.
| Concern | Consequence |
|---|---|
| Operator credential theft | Web UI logins intercepted |
Prioritize urgent remediation if any of the following are true:
*.pem, *.crt, *.cer, or ca paths without authentication in HTTP logscertlm.msc → Trusted Root Certification Authorities/usr/local/share/ca-certificates/, /etc/pki/rootCA.crt or similar bundled filesWindows PowerShell — list trusted roots with "Dahua" or device OEM strings:
Get-ChildItem Cert:\LocalMachine\Root | Where-Object { $_.Subject -match 'Dahua|OEM|IPC' } | Format-List Subject, Thumbprint, NotAfter
Linux — search imported local CAs:
grep -ri 'dahua\|BEGIN CERTIFICATE' /usr/local/share/ca-certificates/ /etc/ssl/certs/ 2>/dev/null
On estates also affected by CVE-2026-29115 or CVE-2026-29116, combine firmware upgrades — but note different build cutoffs (this CVE: 2026-04-15 vs. 2026-03-26 for the DoS issues).
Until firmware is patched:
There is no purely configurative fix on the device that substitutes for firmware correction if the CA material remains externally accessible in vulnerable builds.
Dahua published this issue through its Product Security Incident (PSI) program:
Consult the vendor bulletin for:
This document is an informational security advisory compiled from publicly available CVE metadata and vendor statements. It is intended to assist defenders, integrators, and researchers in understanding CVE-2026-29114 risk and prioritizing remediation.
Responsible use: Conduct certificate exposure checks only on systems you own or are authorized to test. Report additional findings through coordinated disclosure channels.
| Version | Date | Changes |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | 2026-07-11 | Initial comprehensive advisory README based on CVE-2026-29114 publication data |
CVE-2026-29114 · Dahua Technology · CVSS 4.0 2.3 LOW · CWE-538 · IPC
| Field | Value |
|---|
| CVE ID | CVE-2026-29114 |
| Vendor | Dahua Technology |
| Vulnerability Type | Sensitive certificate material exposure / trust-chain abuse |
| Attack Vector | Network |
| Authentication Required | No |
| User Interaction Required | Passive (UI:P) |
| Attack Requirements | Present (AT:P) |
| Privileges Required | None |
| CVSS Version | 4.0 |
| CVSS Base Score | 2.3 — LOW |
| CVSS Vector | CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N |
| CWE | CWE-538 (Insertion of Sensitive Information into Externally-Accessible File or Directory) |
| Remotely Exploitable | Yes |
| Published Date | 2026-06-10 |
| Fix Availability | Firmware builds from April 15, 2026 onward (per vendor guidance) |
| Attribute | CVE-2026-29114 (this advisory) | CVE-2026-29115 | CVE-2026-29116 |
|---|
| CVSS 4.0 Score | 2.3 — LOW | 6.9 — MEDIUM | 8.7 — HIGH |
| Primary Impact | Confidentiality + Integrity (Low) | Availability (High) | Availability (High) |
| Authentication | Not required | High privileges required | Not required |
| Affected Products | IPC only | IPC, SD | IPC, SD, NVR, XVR, EVS, VTO, VTH, ASI, TPC |
| Fix Build Cutoff | Before 2026-04-15 | Before 2026-03-26 | Before 2026-03-26 |
| CWE | CWE-538 | CWE-617 | CWE-617 |
| Published (UTC) | 2026-06-10T05:44:50 | 2026-06-10T06:08:21 | 2026-06-10T06:16:34 |
| Date | Event |
|---|
| ≤ 2026-04-15 | Vulnerable IPC firmware builds in active distribution |
| 2026-04-15 | Vendor fix cutoff — builds produced on or after this date are outside the affected range (per advisory) |
| 2026-06-10T05:44:50 UTC | CVE-2026-29114 published |
| 2026-06-10T05:44:50 UTC | NVD record last modified |
| 2026-06-10 | Related CVE-2026-29115 and CVE-2026-29116 published later same day |
| Ongoing | Operators should audit trust stores and IPC firmware build dates |
| Client software installers | Bundled root to "make HTTPS work" without public CA cost |
| Metric | Value | Meaning for this CVE |
|---|
| AV (Attack Vector) | Network (N) | Remote retrieval of exposed certificate material |
| AC (Attack Complexity) | Low (L) | No special timing or race conditions indicated |
| AT (Attack Requirements) | Present (P) | Client trust installation and TLS usage conditions apply |
| PR (Privileges Required) | None (N) | No device login needed to obtain exposed material |
| UI (User Interaction) | Passive (P) | Victim TLS/browser/client activity involved in impact chain |
| VC (Vuln System Confidentiality) | Low (L) | Sensitive CA material disclosure from device |
| VI (Vuln System Integrity) | Low (L) | Trust mechanism integrity weakened |
| VA (Vuln System Availability) | None (N) | Device uptime unaffected |
| SC / SI / SA | None | Subsequent systems not separately scored |
AT:P |
| Not every deployment installs device CA on clients |
UI:P | Impact chain includes user/client TLS activity |
VC:L / VI:L | Direct device impact rated Low, not High |
VA:N | No reboot/outage component |
| CWE-326 | Inadequate Encryption Strength | Orthogonal hardening concern for device TLS |
| Prerequisite | Required? | Notes |
|---|
| Device credentials | No | PR:N — material obtainable without login |
| Network reachability to IPC | Yes | Remote exploitation |
| Device CA trusted on client | Yes (for MITM impact) | Core AT:P condition |
| User TLS activity | Yes (for practical MITM) | UI:P |
| Affected model + firmware | Yes | IPC builds before 2026-04-15 |
| Availability of private key | Likely for full MITM | Vendor text highlights root CA obtainability; verify via authorized testing |
| Domain | On Device (Scored) | On Clients (Operational) |
|---|
| Confidentiality | Low (VC:L) | Potential MITM disclosure of TLS traffic |
| Integrity | Low (VI:L) | Forged certs accepted by trusting clients |
| Availability | None (VA:N) | Not a reboot/outage issue |
| False sense of TLS security | Teams believe HTTPS equals public-CA-grade trust |
| Compliance | PCI, ISO 27001, or internal audits may flag unmanaged private CAs |
| Incident response cost | Enterprise-wide trust store cleanup is labor-intensive |
| Step | Action |
|---|
| 1 | Identify all endpoints where device CA roots were installed |
| 2 | Remove those roots from user and machine trust stores |
| 3 | Replace with proper trust model: public CA certs, corporate PKI, or per-device certs via ACME/internal CA |
| 4 | Communicate to integrators: do not bundle device roots in gold images |
| 5 | Re-issue TLS credentials on affected IPCs after firmware patch |
| Practice | Recommendation |
|---|
| Never trust camera-embedded CAs enterprise-wide | Use browser exception only where unavoidable, per-device |
| Prefer public or corporate PKI | Issue certs from controlled CAs with offline roots |
| Segment management HTTPS | Access cameras via VPN; don't port-forward self-signed UI |
| Monitor trust store drift | MDM/GPO audits for unauthorized root additions |
| Rotate after exposure | Treat retrieved CA material as compromised |
| Resource | URL |
|---|
| Dahua PSI Trust Center | https://www.dahuasecurity.com/about-dahua/trust-center/dahua-psi |
| NVD Entry | https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-29114 |
| CVE Record | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-29114 |
| Related: CVE-2026-29115 | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-29115 |
| Related: CVE-2026-29116 | https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-29116 |
| CWE-538 Definition | https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/538.html |
| CVSS 4.0 Specification | https://www.first.org/cvss/v4.0/specification-document |