
The credit score for npm packages. Analyze package reputation, maintenance, security, publisher trust, and ecosystem health before you install any package.
The credit score for npm packages.
Revera helps you decide whether a package is worth installing before you run npm install. It analyzes package quality, maintenance, security, ecosystem health, and publisher trust — and now propagates risk transitively across your entire dependency graph — then produces an explainable, Bayesian reputation report.
Watch revera check and explain packages in real time.
Run revera instantly without installation:
npx revera check react
Checking a package like request (which was deprecated in 2020) immediately warns you with specific reasons:
$ revera why request
▲ revera EXPLAIN
──────────────────────────────────────────────────
Package: [email protected]
Overall: 38/100 Not Recommended
Score Breakdown
Maintenance 15/100 ███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░
Release cadence, commit activity, issue responsiveness, maintainer count
Stability 90/100 ██████████████████░░
SemVer compliance, major version history, API volatility over time
Security 100/100 ████████████████████
Known CVEs, install scripts, repository transparency
Package Quality 40/100 ████████░░░░░░░░░░░░
README completeness, license, test coverage indicators, exports
Ecosystem 100/100 ████████████████████
Weekly download volume, GitHub stars, community forks
Documentation 90/100 ██████████████████░░
README length, code examples, API references, external docs presence
Developer Experience 40/100 ████████░░░░░░░░░░░░
TypeScript support, ESM compatibility, CLI tooling
Publisher Trust 100/100 ████████████████████
Known malicious releases, protestware history, supply-chain incidents
Why it scores well
+ Stable API (v1.0.0+)
+ Low API volatility
+ Zero known vulnerabilities
+ Permissive open-source license
+ Code examples in README
+ Structured API documentation
+ No known publisher trust incidents
Minor deductions
- Last release was 59 months ago
- Single maintainer (bus factor of 1)
- Missing native type definitions
- Legacy CommonJS only
- No native typings (bad TypeScript DX)
Warnings
! Last release: 59 months ago. No recent updates detected. This may be normal for mature, stable libraries.
! Package has been officially marked as deprecated by the maintainer.
Verdict
Request has low confidence. revera recommends looking for alternatives due to security, activity, or stability concerns.
Install globally to access the executable from any directory:
npm install -g @aaravmaloo/revera
Analyze a package and get a high-level summary report:
revera check lodash
Run in offline mode using cached files:
revera check express --offline
Get a deep-dive breakdown of the score, positive signals, and deductions:
revera why node-ipc
Screens packages before installation and warns when reputation falls below your configured threshold:
revera add express
You can pass flags directly to your package manager:
revera add typescript --save-dev
Audit all packages in the current project (includes transitive dependencies) and calculate an overall project health score:
revera audit
Audit production dependencies only:
revera audit --prod
Audit direct dependencies only, skipping transitive dependencies:
revera audit --direct
Authenticate with GitHub to increase API rate limits (60/hour anonymous vs 5,000/hour authenticated). You can choose between browser-based OAuth2 or manually entering a Personal Access Token. Once authorized, revera securely encrypts and stores the token in your OS keyring (Windows DPAPI, macOS Keychain, or Linux Secret Service):
revera login
Manage local settings saved in ~/.revera/config.json:
revera config
revera config set minScoreThreshold 75
revera config get minScoreThreshold
Verify environment settings, API status, and network connection latencies:
revera doctor
Inspect or clear local metadata cache:
revera cache
revera cache clear
Verify if you are running the latest version of the revera engine:
revera update
Revera v2 replaced the legacy flat weighted-sum model with a four-stage Bayesian DAG pipeline.
All dependencies in the project are resolved into a directed acyclic graph. Each node tracks its full transitive dependent set so that later stages can compute accurate blast radii.
lodash ──► your-app
express ──► your-app
axios ──► some-lib ──► your-app ← transitive
Each of the 8 scoring categories starts from an archetype-specific prior (framework, cli, types-only, utility) rather than a flat uninformed baseline. Observed signals update a Beta distribution posterior — meaning a timeout or missing data widens the credible interval rather than silently defaulting to "clean".
The final per-package score is a confidence-weighted aggregate of category posteriors (inverse-variance weighting), producing both a point estimate and a 95% credible interval.
Three hard overrides bypass the Bayesian scoring entirely and immediately fail a package:
| Veto |
|---|
After per-package scores are computed, risk is propagated bottom-up through the DAG (topological order, leaves first):
effectiveRisk exceeds a threshold, its parent's risk is floored at 0.8 (flagged as tainted).effectiveRisk × transitive_dependent_count.The final audit report merges intrinsic scores, inherited taint, credible intervals, and blast radii into a single ranked output. The overall workspace score is a weighted average by blast radius.
Revera queries three independent vulnerability databases in parallel on every check. Results are merged and deduplicated by CVE/GHSA alias before being used in scoring.
If a source times out or errors, the others continue independently. The VulnResult exposes which sources responded (sources) and which failed (failedSources) so the Bayesian scorer can widen the uncertainty interval appropriately rather than assuming clean.
.github/ # CI configurations
docs/ # Architecture specs and algorithm diagrams
src/
├── commands/ # CLI command handlers (check, why, add, audit, config, cache, update)
├── engine/
│ ├── dag.ts # DAG construction + topological sort + blast-radius computation
│ ├── propagation.ts # Bottom-up transitive risk propagation
│ ├── scoring.ts # Bayesian Beta posteriors, archetype priors, veto checks
│ ├── vuln.ts # Multi-source vuln aggregator (OSV + GitHub + npm)
│ ├── trust.ts # Publisher trust incident database
│ ├── typosquat.ts # Edit-distance typosquat detection
│ ├── npm.ts # npm registry + download stats fetcher
│ └── github.ts # GitHub repo stats + README fetcher
├── ui/ # Console view templates (reporter formatters, theme styles)
└── utils/ # Filesystem helpers (caching, configuration, package managers)
tests/ # Unit test suites
benchmarker/ # Large-scale benchmark suite (100k+ packages)
Revera ships with a built-in large-scale benchmark suite in benchmarker/ that tests against 100k+ npm packages in parallel and produces a single, GitHub-readable report.
cd benchmarker
npm install
npm run fetch-dataset # one-time: pulls ~100k packages into datasets/npm.jsonl
./benchmark.sh --workers 16 # runs the full suite
Each run produces a self-contained output directory with:
The v1 benchmark was run before the v2 veto checks were deployed. The per-label malicious/typosquat numbers reflect the legacy algorithm. A full v2 re-run will be published in the next release.
BENCHMARK.md)Without a token, anonymous queries are rate-limited to 60 requests per hour. You can set a Personal Access Token in your configuration:
revera config set githubToken ghp_YOUR_TOKEN
Revera falls back to using cache files. You can explicitly run commands in offline mode with the --offline flag. If a vulnerability source is unavailable, the Bayesian scorer widens the credible interval for that package rather than assuming clean.
Revera acts as a shell wrapper. It runs the real package installer after screening.
A package is marked tainted when one of its transitive dependencies triggered a veto or scored critically low. The audit output shows the worst subpath so you can trace the exact chain of dependencies that caused the flag.
Each vulnerability is identified by its CVE ID, GHSA ID, or npm advisory ID. When the same vulnerability appears in multiple sources, it is merged into one canonical entry. OSV data takes priority for prose fields (summary, details); the highest severity rating and most complete patched-version range across all sources are preserved.
Please review the Contributing Guide to get started with setup, style rules, and PR guidelines.
Revera provides a reputation score based on observable project signals and historical data. It is intended to assist engineering decisions and should not be treated as a definitive security audit.
Revera is distributed under the MIT License.
| Feature | npm audit | osv-scanner | Socket | revera |
|---|
| CVE Vulnerabilities | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
| Multiple Vuln DBs | ✖ | Partial | ✔ | ✔ |
| Ecosystem Reputation | ✖ | ✖ | Partial | ✔ |
| Explainable Scoring | ✖ | ✖ | Partial | ✔ |
| Publisher Trust Check | ✖ | ✖ | Partial | ✔ |
| Typosquat Detection | ✖ | ✖ | Partial | ✔ |
| Transitive Risk Propagation | ✖ | ✖ | ✖ | ✔ |
| Bayesian Confidence Intervals | ✖ | ✖ | ✖ | ✔ |
| Category | Weight | Focus Areas |
|---|
| Security | 20% | Active CVEs (3 DBs), install scripts, repository transparency |
| Publisher Trust | 15% | Protestware history, deliberate sabotage, account hijack incidents |
| Maintenance | 13% | Publish cadence, recent commits, open issues response ratio |
| Stability | 12% | SemVer compliance, major version frequency, pre-1.0 maturity |
| Package Quality | 13% | Source file sizes, license, exports configuration |
| Ecosystem | 13% | Weekly downloads (log-scaled), GitHub stars, contributor count |
| Documentation | 9% | README completeness, code examples, API reference coverage |
| Developer Experience | 5% | Native TS typings, ESM exports, tree-shaking support |
| Trigger |
|---|
| Critical Trust Incident | Publisher has a confirmed supply-chain attack or protestware release |
| Typosquat | Edit distance ≤ 1 from a top-N package (e.g. lodahs, expres) |
| Unpatched Critical CVE | A CRITICAL severity vulnerability with no patched version available |
| Database | Source | Auth Required | Notes |
|---|
| OSV (osv.dev) | Google Open Source Security | ✖ | Aggregates NVD, GitHub Advisory, RUSTSEC, and more |
| GitHub Advisory DB | GitHub Security | ✖ | Rich CVSS scores + patched-version ranges |
| npm Advisory | registry.npmjs.org | ✖ | Same data as npm audit; sometimes publishes before OSV |
| File | Description |
|---|
BENCHMARK.md | Single GitHub-readable report (accuracy, per-label detection, score distribution, latency) |
report.html | Interactive browser report with charts |
summary.json | Machine-readable aggregated stats |
results.jsonl | Per-package results for all tested packages |
comparison.json | Delta vs the previous run (regressions + improvements) |
| Label | Packages | Accuracy |
|---|
trusted | 7,051 | 96.6% |
malicious | 9 | 22.2% (v1 baseline — v2 veto checks fix this) |
typosquat | 20 | 35.0% (v1 baseline — v2 edit-distance veto fixes this) |
| Overall (labeled) | 7,085 | 96.5% |